Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter/vf_bwdif_cuda: CUDA implementation of bwdif

2020-10-13 Thread Thomas Mundt
Am Mo., 12. Okt. 2020 um 21:42 Uhr schrieb Philip Langdale < phil...@overt.org>: > On Sun, 11 Oct 2020 18:36:42 +0200 > Thomas Mundt wrote: > > > Hi Philip, > > > > Am Fr., 9. Okt. 2020 um 18:33 Uhr schrieb Philip Langdale > > > >: > > > > > I've been sitting on this for a couple of years now,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter/vf_bwdif_cuda: CUDA implementation of bwdif

2020-10-12 Thread Philip Langdale
On Sun, 11 Oct 2020 18:36:42 +0200 Thomas Mundt wrote: > Hi Philip, > > Am Fr., 9. Okt. 2020 um 18:33 Uhr schrieb Philip Langdale > >: > > > I've been sitting on this for a couple of years now, and I figured I > > should just send it out. This is what I believe is a conceptually > > correct

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter/vf_bwdif_cuda: CUDA implementation of bwdif

2020-10-11 Thread Thomas Mundt
Hi Philip, Am Fr., 9. Okt. 2020 um 18:33 Uhr schrieb Philip Langdale : > I've been sitting on this for a couple of years now, and I figured I > should just send it out. This is what I believe is a conceptually > correct port of bwdif to cuda (modulo edge handling which is not done > in the same

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter/vf_bwdif_cuda: CUDA implementation of bwdif

2020-10-09 Thread Philip Langdale
I've been sitting on this for a couple of years now, and I figured I should just send it out. This is what I believe is a conceptually correct port of bwdif to cuda (modulo edge handling which is not done in the same way because the conditional checks for edges are expensive in cuda, but that's