On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:16:00AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Oct
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:16:00AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On T
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:16:00AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sat,
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 11:16:00 -0400
Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Oct 3
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:23 AM, wm4 wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 11:16:00 -0400
> Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 9:39 P
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>>> wrote:
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Mich
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Michael Niedermayer
>>> wrote:
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 01:23:03PM -040
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Michael Niedermayer
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 01:23:03PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 12:58 P
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 01:23:03PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Michael Niedermayer
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 10:5
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 01:23:03PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Michael Niedermayer
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 10:55:26PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 01:23:03PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 10:55:26PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> >> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >>
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 10:55:26PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sat
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 10:55:26PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Fri,
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Michael Niedermayer
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Michael Niedermayer
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 05:15:50PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> >> This patch results i
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 05:15:50PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> >> This patch results in identical behavior of movenc, and suppresses
> -Wstrict-overflow
> >>
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 05:15:50PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> This patch results in identical behavior of movenc, and suppresses
>> -Wstrict-overflow
>> warnings observed in GCC 5.2.
>> I have manually checked that all usages
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 05:15:50PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> This patch results in identical behavior of movenc, and suppresses
> -Wstrict-overflow
> warnings observed in GCC 5.2.
> I have manually checked that all usages are safe, and overflow possibility
> does
> not exist with this ex
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> This patch results in identical behavior of movenc, and suppresses
> -Wstrict-overflow
> warnings observed in GCC 5.2.
> I have manually checked that all usages are safe, and overflow possibility
> does
> not exist with this expression
This patch results in identical behavior of movenc, and suppresses
-Wstrict-overflow
warnings observed in GCC 5.2.
I have manually checked that all usages are safe, and overflow possibility does
not exist with this expression rewrite.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde
---
libavformat/movenc.c |
22 matches
Mail list logo