Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat/mxfdec: fixed jp2k_rsiz and 170M matrix

2021-06-13 Thread Tomas Härdin
sön 2021-06-13 klockan 21:48 +0200 skrev Thilo Borgmann: > Am 13.06.21 um 21:07 schrieb Tomas Härdin: > > sön 2021-06-06 klockan 05:27 +0300 skrev Valerii Zapodovnikov: > > > Again. 240M matrix is different from BT.601! And 170M is the same > > > as BT.601. It is primaries that are the same in

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat/mxfdec: fixed jp2k_rsiz and 170M matrix

2021-06-13 Thread Thilo Borgmann
Am 13.06.21 um 21:07 schrieb Tomas Härdin: sön 2021-06-06 klockan 05:27 +0300 skrev Valerii Zapodovnikov: Again. 240M matrix is different from BT.601! And 170M is the same as BT.601. It is primaries that are the same in 240M and 170M, as for jp2k_rsiz see page 17 of ST 422:2019. IT WAS THERE

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat/mxfdec: fixed jp2k_rsiz and 170M matrix

2021-06-13 Thread Tomas Härdin
sön 2021-06-06 klockan 05:27 +0300 skrev Valerii Zapodovnikov: > Again. 240M matrix is different from BT.601! And 170M is the same > as BT.601. It is primaries that are the same in 240M and 170M, as > for jp2k_rsiz see page 17 of ST 422:2019. IT WAS THERE since 2006. > This wrong jp2k_rsiz is a

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat/mxfdec: fixed jp2k_rsiz and 170M matrix

2021-06-05 Thread Valerii Zapodovnikov
Again. 240M matrix is different from BT.601! And 170M is the same as BT.601. It is primaries that are the same in 240M and 170M, as for jp2k_rsiz see page 17 of ST 422:2019. IT WAS THERE since 2006. This wrong jp2k_rsiz is a copy-paste of header_open_partition_key. --- libavformat/mxf.c| 2 +-