On 9/25/2019 9:05 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> Up until now, ff_packet_list_put had a flaw: When it moved a packet to
> the list (meaning, when it ought to move the reference to the packet
> list instead of creating a new one via av_packet_ref), it did not reset
> the original packet, confusing
Up until now, ff_packet_list_put had a flaw: When it moved a packet to
the list (meaning, when it ought to move the reference to the packet
list instead of creating a new one via av_packet_ref), it did not reset
the original packet, confusing the ownership of the data in the packet.
This has been
