On 08/16/2016 06:42 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
Le decadi 30 thermidor, an CCXXIV, Marton Balint a écrit :
I think the idea was to document this limitation to the fifo muxer only.
That would be acceptable, although I still think it would be preferable to
avoid that requirement altogether.
Regar
Le decadi 30 thermidor, an CCXXIV, Marton Balint a écrit :
> I think the idea was to document this limitation to the fifo muxer only.
That would be acceptable, although I still think it would be preferable to
avoid that requirement altogether.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Descri
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, Nicolas George wrote:
Le decadi 30 thermidor, an CCXXIV, sebechlebsky...@gmail.com a écrit :
From: Jan Sebechlebsky
Muxing might be running in a separate thread if actual muxer is
run inside of fifo pseudo-muxer. Callback should be therefore
thread-safe.
This is an inc
Le decadi 30 thermidor, an CCXXIV, sebechlebsky...@gmail.com a écrit :
> From: Jan Sebechlebsky
>
> Muxing might be running in a separate thread if actual muxer is
> run inside of fifo pseudo-muxer. Callback should be therefore
> thread-safe.
This is an incompatible API change, and therefore not
From: Jan Sebechlebsky
Muxing might be running in a separate thread if actual muxer is
run inside of fifo pseudo-muxer. Callback should be therefore
thread-safe.
Signed-off-by: Jan Sebechlebsky
---
libavformat/avformat.h | 2 +-
libavformat/avio.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+),