On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 08:58:10AM +0200, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> 2015-09-28 18:51 GMT+02:00 Christophe Gisquet :
> [SNIP]
>
> Could someone also apply the cosmetic patch for reindentation?
applied
thanks
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
No
2015-09-28 18:51 GMT+02:00 Christophe Gisquet :
[SNIP]
Could someone also apply the cosmetic patch for reindentation?
Thanks,
Christophe
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 09:54:49PM +0200, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2015-10-01 21:35 GMT+02:00 Michael Niedermayer :
> > ffmpeg/libavcodec/arm/blockdsp_arm.h:24:6: note: previous declaration of
> > ‘ff_blockdsp_init_neon’ was here
>
> Missed that header... I can only find those using g
Hi,
2015-10-01 21:35 GMT+02:00 Michael Niedermayer :
> ffmpeg/libavcodec/arm/blockdsp_arm.h:24:6: note: previous declaration of
> ‘ff_blockdsp_init_neon’ was here
Missed that header... I can only find those using grep...
Here's an updated patch.
--
Christophe
From 8da8a89ecf33e0c550fa61d6423a
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 06:51:07PM +0200, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> This parameter is intended for pixel data, while the functions are
> actually only called for dct blocks.
>
> I admit I haven't run this over all of fate, so it would be nice to
> validate nothing actually uses it for pixels (I
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Christophe Gisquet <
christophe.gisq...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2015-10-01 14:40 GMT+02:00 Ronald S. Bultje :
> > bash-3.2$ grep ff_pixblockdsp_init ../libavcodec/*
> > ../libavcodec/asvenc.c:ff_pixblockdsp_init(&a->pdsp, avctx);
> > ../libavcodec/avdct.c:
2015-10-01 14:40 GMT+02:00 Ronald S. Bultje :
> bash-3.2$ grep ff_pixblockdsp_init ../libavcodec/*
> ../libavcodec/asvenc.c:ff_pixblockdsp_init(&a->pdsp, avctx);
> ../libavcodec/avdct.c:ff_pixblockdsp_init(&pdsp, avctx);
> ../libavcodec/dnxhdenc.c:ff_pixblockdsp_init(&ctx->m.pdsp, a
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Christophe Gisquet <
christophe.gisq...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2015-09-28 18:51 GMT+02:00 Christophe Gisquet <
> christophe.gisq...@gmail.com>:
> > I admit I haven't run this over all of fate, so it would be nice to
> > validate nothing actually uses it for pixels
2015-09-28 18:51 GMT+02:00 Christophe Gisquet :
> I admit I haven't run this over all of fate, so it would be nice to
> validate nothing actually uses it for pixels (I have see nothing of
> the sort).
Passes fate-video fate-vcodec on Win64.
--
Christophe
_
This parameter is intended for pixel data, while the functions are
actually only called for dct blocks.
I admit I haven't run this over all of fate, so it would be nice to
validate nothing actually uses it for pixels (I have see nothing of
the sort).
--
Christophe
From d89cdcaf4f71bcb910e57184c2
10 matches
Mail list logo