On 1/7/2018 12:07 AM, KO Myung-Hun wrote:
> Ping ?
>
> KO Myung-Hun wrote:
>> Hi/2.
>>
>> Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
>>> On 12/29/2017 6:36 AM, KO Myung-Hun wrote:
Sorry about that.
SDL2 uses SDLCALL to specify a calling convention. On OS/2, it's defined
to `_System' which is
Ping ?
KO Myung-Hun wrote:
> Hi/2.
>
> Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
>> On 12/29/2017 6:36 AM, KO Myung-Hun wrote:
>>> Sorry about that.
>>>
>>> SDL2 uses SDLCALL to specify a calling convention. On OS/2, it's defined
>>> to `_System' which is similar to `_cdecl' but does not prepend '_'.
>>>
>>>
Hi/2.
Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> On 12/29/2017 6:36 AM, KO Myung-Hun wrote:
>> Sorry about that.
>>
>> SDL2 uses SDLCALL to specify a calling convention. On OS/2, it's defined
>> to `_System' which is similar to `_cdecl' but does not prepend '_'.
>>
>> After all, without a header, a function is
On 12/29/2017 6:36 AM, KO Myung-Hun wrote:
> Sorry about that.
>
> SDL2 uses SDLCALL to specify a calling convention. On OS/2, it's defined
> to `_System' which is similar to `_cdecl' but does not prepend '_'.
>
> After all, without a header, a function is used without `_System'. And
> linker
Hi/2.
Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> On 12/28/2017 2:44 PM, KO Myung-Hun wrote:
>> On OS/2, '_' is not prepended to a function name.
>> ---
>> configure | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> It's not immediately clear to be how checking a header instead relates
> to
On 12/28/2017 2:44 PM, KO Myung-Hun wrote:
> On OS/2, '_' is not prepended to a function name.
> ---
> configure | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
It's not immediately clear to be how checking a header instead relates
to function name mangling (or lack thereof)?
-
On OS/2, '_' is not prepended to a function name.
---
configure | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index 70de780f82..f937ddf2be 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -6019,14 +6019,14 @@ fi
if enabled sdl2; then
