On Sun, 18 Jun 2017 20:41:39 +0200
Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 6/15/17, wm4 wrote:
> > Those are warnings, not error messages. Fixed locally.
> > ___
> > ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-d
On 6/15/17, wm4 wrote:
> Those are warnings, not error messages. Fixed locally.
> ___
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
should be ok
___
Those are warnings, not error messages. Fixed locally.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
It is wrong/incorrect in two aspects:
1. The pixel format is not enough to guarantee that the resulting file
will be any more compatible with media players.
2. Media players not supporting higher profiles are not necessarily
outdated (in fact this is simply an arrogant statement that
libav
