On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 01:44:53PM +, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> Padded SPS/PPS is perfectly legal.
thats likely true.
IIRC the case ive seen was not valid padding but random unindentified
bytes though.
Also the implementation truncates arbitrarily at 4096 bytes
additional bytes might be anything
ping
On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 at 14:44 Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> Padded SPS/PPS is perfectly legal.
>
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
Padded SPS/PPS is perfectly legal.
0001-h264-Make-Truncating-SPS-PPS-message-debug.patch
Description: Binary data
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
