Users can be unaware of -vframes/-frames:v when they want to output a single
image.
May prevent invalid bug reports such as #5701.
Signed-off-by: Lou Logan
---
libavformat/img2enc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libavformat/img2enc.c b/libavformat/img2enc.c
Lou Logan lrcd.com> writes:
> or use -vframes 1 to output single image)\n",
Since this is a muxer and -vframes is an ffmpeg option,
I am not convinced this is a good solution.
Note that -vsync vfr also "fixes" ticket #5701.
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-dev
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 21:08:40 + (UTC), Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Lou Logan lrcd.com> writes:
>
> > or use -vframes 1 to output single image)\n",
>
> Since this is a muxer and -vframes is an ffmpeg option,
> I am not convinced this is a good solution.
> Note that -vsync vfr also "fixes" ti
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 13:31:08 -0800, Lou Logan wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 21:08:40 + (UTC), Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > Lou Logan lrcd.com> writes:
> > > or use -vframes 1 to output single image)\n",
> >
> > Since this is a muxer and -vframes is an ffmpeg option,
> > I am not convince
