Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavf/mxfenc: Bump EDIT_UNITS_PER_BODY

2023-02-14 Thread Tomas Härdin
mån 2023-02-13 klockan 22:05 +0100 skrev Marton Balint: > > I think we have a pretty good idea that MPEG2 in MXF usually means > some > broadcast realted use, therefore intent of RDD9 compliance by default > is > not insane at all for MPEG2 essence. Can we please keep it as default > for > MPEG

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavf/mxfenc: Bump EDIT_UNITS_PER_BODY

2023-02-13 Thread Marton Balint
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023, Tomas Härdin wrote: mån 2023-02-13 klockan 20:33 +0100 skrev Marton Balint: On Mon, 13 Feb 2023, Tomas Härdin wrote: > Passes FATE because we don't have any tests that mux files with a > whopping 250 frames. Tested with a jpeg2000 Tears of Steel sample. Have you check

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavf/mxfenc: Bump EDIT_UNITS_PER_BODY

2023-02-13 Thread Tomas Härdin
mån 2023-02-13 klockan 20:33 +0100 skrev Marton Balint: > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2023, Tomas Härdin wrote: > > > Passes FATE because we don't have any tests that mux files with a > > whopping 250 frames. Tested with a jpeg2000 Tears of Steel sample. > > Have you checked what BMX does? Because as fa

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavf/mxfenc: Bump EDIT_UNITS_PER_BODY

2023-02-13 Thread Marton Balint
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023, Tomas Härdin wrote: Passes FATE because we don't have any tests that mux files with a whopping 250 frames. Tested with a jpeg2000 Tears of Steel sample. Have you checked what BMX does? Because as far as I remember for RDD9 (XDCAM HD) this should not exceed 10 seconds.

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavf/mxfenc: Bump EDIT_UNITS_PER_BODY

2023-02-13 Thread Tomas Härdin
Passes FATE because we don't have any tests that mux files with a whopping 250 frames. Tested with a jpeg2000 Tears of Steel sample. /Tomas From ad87019bf1ec7540a43e9a56acaf7adb32c917ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Tomas=20H=C3=A4rdin?= Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 10:55:06 +0100 Subject: [