On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 7:09 AM, wm4 wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:19:38 +0700
> Muhammad Faiz wrote:
>
>> for higher quality resampling
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Faiz
>> ---
>
> This patch triggers this assertion:
>
> Assertion
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:19:38 +0700
Muhammad Faiz wrote:
> for higher quality resampling
>
> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Faiz
> ---
This patch triggers this assertion:
Assertion !c->frac && !c->dst_incr_mod && !c->compensation_distance failed at
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 11:11:05AM +0700, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Michael Niedermayer
>>>
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 11:11:05AM +0700, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Michael Niedermayer
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 09:19:38AM +0700, Muhammad
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 01:49:41PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 3/10/17, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 11:11:05AM +0700, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> >> wrote:
> >> >
On 3/10/17, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 11:11:05AM +0700, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Michael Niedermayer
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 09:19:38AM +0700, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
>> >> for
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 11:11:05AM +0700, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 09:19:38AM +0700, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
> >> for higher quality resampling
> >
> > can you hear the difference ?
>
>
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 09:19:38AM +0700, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
>> for higher quality resampling
>
> can you hear the difference ?
Yes, but it is sinesweep test audio, not real music audio.
Thank's
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Marton Balint wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
>
>> for higher quality resampling
>
>
> How much slower is it?
Not slower when exact_rational doesn't fail, because it doesn't trigger
linear interpolation (even when
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 09:19:38AM +0700, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
> for higher quality resampling
can you hear the difference ?
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Many things microsoft did are stupid, but not doing something just because
microsoft did
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
for higher quality resampling
How much slower is it?
Thanks,
Marton
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Faiz
---
doc/resampler.texi | 5 +-
libswresample/options.c | 4 +-
tests/fate/libswresample.mak | 189
for higher quality resampling
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Faiz
---
doc/resampler.texi | 5 +-
libswresample/options.c | 4 +-
tests/fate/libswresample.mak | 189 ---
tests/ref/acodec/s302m | 6 +-
12 matches
Mail list logo