On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:57:20AM +0100, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2015-02-17 20:06 GMT+01:00 James Almer :
> > $ make libavcodec/x86/dcadsp.o DBG=0
>
> OK, it's mainly a matter of documentation then here, as just having
> DBG defined is fine. I'm not sure of the makefile syntax if DBG
Hi,
2015-02-17 20:06 GMT+01:00 James Almer :
> $ make libavcodec/x86/dcadsp.o DBG=0
OK, it's mainly a matter of documentation then here, as just having
DBG defined is fine. I'm not sure of the makefile syntax if DBG=1 is
what is really wanted.
> YASMlibavcodec/x86/dcadsp.dbg.asm
> YASMli
On 17/02/15 9:21 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 02:54:25PM +0100, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2015-02-08 14:07 GMT+01:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos :
>>> Doesn't this also need an update for "make clean"?
>>
>> Right, here's an updated one, also improving dependency gener
Hi,
2015-02-17 13:29 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer :
> also, i wonder, should this be extended to also work with C files ?
Again, with asm, macro hell sometimes gives you that. So it makes sense.
I don't know well enough icc/llvm/whatever we handle, so the main
issue might be to ask the compiler
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 01:25:10PM +0100, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2015-02-17 13:21 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer :
> > btw, this works too: (without DBG=1)
> > make V=2 libavcodec/x86/vp8dsp_loopfilter.dbg.o
>
> Yeah, once I'm working on a specific file, that's what I do.
>
> But iir
Hi,
2015-02-17 13:21 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer :
> btw, this works too: (without DBG=1)
> make V=2 libavcodec/x86/vp8dsp_loopfilter.dbg.o
Yeah, once I'm working on a specific file, that's what I do.
But iirc, you can just do make DBG=1 and wait for any error to mention
the offending .dbg.asm
On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 02:54:25PM +0100, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2015-02-08 14:07 GMT+01:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos :
> > Doesn't this also need an update for "make clean"?
>
> Right, here's an updated one, also improving dependency generation and
> allowing more genering (for now) code.
>
Hi,
2015-02-08 14:54 GMT+01:00 Christophe Gisquet :
> 2015-02-08 14:07 GMT+01:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos :
>> Doesn't this also need an update for "make clean"?
>
> Right, here's an updated one, also improving dependency generation and
> allowing more genering (for now) code.
Ping?
I can probably live
Hi,
2015-02-08 14:07 GMT+01:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos :
> Doesn't this also need an update for "make clean"?
Right, here's an updated one, also improving dependency generation and
allowing more genering (for now) code.
--
Christophe
From 6795382920c90fdf7e9cef5031627534c9df15b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 20
Christophe Gisquet gmail.com> writes:
> Suggestions for more efficient make rules, clearer documentation
> and a better macro than the generic 'DBG' welcome.
Doesn't this also need an update for "make clean"?
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
Suggestions for more efficient make rules, clearer documentation and a
better macro than the generic 'DBG' welcome.
--
Christophe
From 8e2adea82a4ec440744b701716a93e6ecaf211d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christophe Gisquet
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 12:18:27 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] x86/doc/Makefile
11 matches
Mail list logo
