Reimar Döffinger gmx.de> writes:
> > Attached patch allows using libopenjpeg 2.x (tested
> > with 2.1) here.
>
> Doesn't it make sense to prefer the newest version,
> i.e. we should check for this first and not last?
Merged by Michael with that change.
Carl Eugen
___
On Wednesday 17 September 2014 09:16:06 am Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> On 16.09.2014, at 22:35, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > Attached patch allows using libopenjpeg 2.x (tested with 2.1) here.
>
> Doesn't it make sense to prefer the newest version, i.e. we should check
> for this first and not last?
On 16.09.2014, at 22:35, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Attached patch allows using libopenjpeg 2.x (tested with 2.1) here.
Doesn't it make sense to prefer the newest version, i.e. we should check for
this first and not last?
___
ffmpeg-devel maili
Hi!
Attached patch allows using libopenjpeg 2.x (tested with 2.1) here.
Based on a patch by mcirsta.
Please comment, Carl Eugen
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index 392cbb1..47fca96 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -4827,6 +4827,7 @@ enabled libopencore_amrwb && require libopencore_a