codemill.se> writes:
> > The original patch was successfully tested:
> > http://ffmpeg.gusari.org/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=2065
> >
> >> No idea really. Can't this flag be taken automagically
> >> from the codec somehow?
> >
> > New patch attached.
> Short and simple. Looks fine to me
Merged by
On 2015-05-04 12:18, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
On Monday 20 April 2015 12:26:50 am Tomas Härdin wrote:
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 00:31 +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Completely untested.
The original patch was successfully tested:
http://ffmpeg.gusari.org/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=2065
No ide
On Monday 20 April 2015 12:26:50 am Tomas Härdin wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 00:31 +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Completely untested.
The original patch was successfully tested:
http://ffmpeg.gusari.org/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=2065
> No idea really. Can't this flag be taken autom
Tomas Härdin codemill.se> writes:
> On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 00:31 +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Completely untested.
> No idea really. Can't this flag be taken automagically
> from the codec somehow?
Just like component_depth...
Since I don't even know how to really test,
I d
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 00:31 +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Completely untested.
>
> Please review, Carl Eugen
No idea really. Can't this flag be taken automagically from the codec
somehow?
/Tomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi!
Completely untested.
Please review, Carl Eugen
diff --git a/libavformat/mxfenc.c b/libavformat/mxfenc.c
index 0b8dfd6..f7c3008 100644
--- a/libavformat/mxfenc.c
+++ b/libavformat/mxfenc.c
@@ -1655,12 +1655,15 @@ AVPacket *pkt)
case 1241:
sc->index = 27;
sc->component_de
