Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavc/amrwbdec: Do not ignore NO_DATA frames

2020-04-11 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Am Mi., 30. Jan. 2019 um 21:08 Uhr schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos : > > 2019-01-30 20:33 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol : > > On 1/30/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > >> 2019-01-29 22:47 GMT+01:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos : > > >>> Attached patch fixes decoding NO_DATA amr-wb frames. > >> > >> Now with patch. > > > Are

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavc/amrwbdec: Do not ignore NO_DATA frames

2020-04-05 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Am So., 5. Apr. 2020 um 17:10 Uhr schrieb James Almer : > > On 4/5/2020 12:07 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > Am So., 5. Apr. 2020 um 16:45 Uhr schrieb James Almer : > >> > >> On 1/30/2019 10:47 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > >>> 2019-01-29 22:47 GMT+01:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos : > Hi! > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavc/amrwbdec: Do not ignore NO_DATA frames

2020-04-05 Thread James Almer
On 4/5/2020 12:07 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Am So., 5. Apr. 2020 um 16:45 Uhr schrieb James Almer : >> >> On 1/30/2019 10:47 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >>> 2019-01-29 22:47 GMT+01:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos : Hi! Attached patch fixes decoding NO_DATA amr-wb frames. >>> >>> Now with

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavc/amrwbdec: Do not ignore NO_DATA frames

2020-04-05 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Am So., 5. Apr. 2020 um 16:45 Uhr schrieb James Almer : > > On 1/30/2019 10:47 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > 2019-01-29 22:47 GMT+01:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos : > >> Hi! > >> > >> Attached patch fixes decoding NO_DATA amr-wb frames. > > > > Now with patch. > > > > Carl Eugen > > > From

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavc/amrwbdec: Do not ignore NO_DATA frames

2020-04-05 Thread James Almer
On 1/30/2019 10:47 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > 2019-01-29 22:47 GMT+01:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos : >> Hi! >> >> Attached patch fixes decoding NO_DATA amr-wb frames. > > Now with patch. > > Carl Eugen > From 0a8c318c49ec358ad646ed601588154cf7d7da37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Carl Eugen Hoyos

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavc/amrwbdec: Do not ignore NO_DATA frames

2020-04-04 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Am Sa., 9. Feb. 2019 um 20:43 Uhr schrieb Paul B Mahol : > > On 2/9/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > 2019-01-30 14:47 GMT+01:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos : > >> 2019-01-29 22:47 GMT+01:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos : > >>> Hi! > >>> > >>> Attached patch fixes decoding NO_DATA amr-wb frames. > >> > >> Now with

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavc/amrwbdec: Do not ignore NO_DATA frames

2019-02-09 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 2/9/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > 2019-01-30 14:47 GMT+01:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos : >> 2019-01-29 22:47 GMT+01:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos : >>> Hi! >>> >>> Attached patch fixes decoding NO_DATA amr-wb frames. >> >> Now with patch. > > Ping. > > This patch is supposed to fix the duration of files with

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavc/amrwbdec: Do not ignore NO_DATA frames

2019-02-09 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
2019-01-30 14:47 GMT+01:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos : > 2019-01-29 22:47 GMT+01:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos : >> Hi! >> >> Attached patch fixes decoding NO_DATA amr-wb frames. > > Now with patch. Ping. This patch is supposed to fix the duration of files with NO_DATA frames. Carl Eugen

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavc/amrwbdec: Do not ignore NO_DATA frames

2019-01-30 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
2019-01-30 20:33 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol : > On 1/30/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> 2019-01-29 22:47 GMT+01:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos : >>> Attached patch fixes decoding NO_DATA amr-wb frames. >> >> Now with patch. > Are you sure that reference decoder gives complete silence > for such frames?

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavc/amrwbdec: Do not ignore NO_DATA frames

2019-01-30 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 1/30/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > 2019-01-29 22:47 GMT+01:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos : >> Hi! >> >> Attached patch fixes decoding NO_DATA amr-wb frames. > > Now with patch. > > Carl Eugen > Are you sure that reference decoder gives complete silence for such frames? Please use memset.

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavc/amrwbdec: Do not ignore NO_DATA frames

2019-01-30 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 1/29/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Hi! > > Attached patch fixes decoding NO_DATA amr-wb frames. > > Please comment, Carl Eugen > ___ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > You forgot

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavc/amrwbdec: Do not ignore NO_DATA frames

2019-01-29 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Hi! Attached patch fixes decoding NO_DATA amr-wb frames. Please comment, Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavc/amrwbdec: Do not ignore NO_DATA frames

2019-01-29 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
2019-01-29 22:36 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol : > On 1/29/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> 2019-01-29 10:10 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol : >>> On 1/29/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: 2019-01-28 19:40 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol : > On 1/28/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> 2019-01-28 16:17 GMT+01:00,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavc/amrwbdec: Do not ignore NO_DATA frames

2019-01-29 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 1/29/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > 2019-01-29 10:10 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol : >> On 1/29/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >>> 2019-01-28 19:40 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol : On 1/28/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > 2019-01-28 16:17 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol : >> On 1/28/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavc/amrwbdec: Do not ignore NO_DATA frames

2019-01-29 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
2019-01-29 10:10 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol : > On 1/29/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> 2019-01-28 19:40 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol : >>> On 1/28/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: 2019-01-28 16:17 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol : > On 1/28/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> 2019-01-28 15:20 GMT+01:00,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavc/amrwbdec: Do not ignore NO_DATA frames

2019-01-29 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 1/29/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > 2019-01-28 19:40 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol : >> On 1/28/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >>> 2019-01-28 16:17 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol : On 1/28/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > 2019-01-28 15:20 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol : >> On 1/28/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavc/amrwbdec: Do not ignore NO_DATA frames

2019-01-28 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
2019-01-28 19:40 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol : > On 1/28/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> 2019-01-28 16:17 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol : >>> On 1/28/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: 2019-01-28 15:20 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol : > On 1/28/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Attached

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavc/amrwbdec: Do not ignore NO_DATA frames

2019-01-28 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 1/28/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > 2019-01-28 16:17 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol : >> On 1/28/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >>> 2019-01-28 15:20 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol : On 1/28/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Hi! > > Attached patch fixes the actual output duration for AMR-WB

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavc/amrwbdec: Do not ignore NO_DATA frames

2019-01-28 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
2019-01-28 16:17 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol : > On 1/28/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> 2019-01-28 15:20 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol : >>> On 1/28/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: Hi! Attached patch fixes the actual output duration for AMR-WB samples with NO_DATA frames. A follow-up

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavc/amrwbdec: Do not ignore NO_DATA frames

2019-01-28 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 1/28/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > 2019-01-28 15:20 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol : >> On 1/28/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> Attached patch fixes the actual output duration for AMR-WB samples >>> with NO_DATA frames. >>> A follow-up patch also skips corrupted frames, making the output

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavc/amrwbdec: Do not ignore NO_DATA frames

2019-01-28 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
2019-01-28 15:20 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol : > On 1/28/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Attached patch fixes the actual output duration for AMR-WB samples >> with NO_DATA frames. >> A follow-up patch also skips corrupted frames, making the output of >> the sample in ticket #7113 very

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavc/amrwbdec: Do not ignore NO_DATA frames

2019-01-28 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 1/28/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Hi! > > Attached patch fixes the actual output duration for AMR-WB samples > with NO_DATA frames. > A follow-up patch also skips corrupted frames, making the output of > the sample in ticket #7113 very similar to the reference decoder. > > Please comment,

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavc/amrwbdec: Do not ignore NO_DATA frames

2019-01-28 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Hi! Attached patch fixes the actual output duration for AMR-WB samples with NO_DATA frames. A follow-up patch also skips corrupted frames, making the output of the sample in ticket #7113 very similar to the reference decoder. Please comment, Carl Eugen From