On 19/10/16 14:24, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
If its entirely untested (due to being unsupported), it should not be
made available, and instead be added once it is supported and has been
confirmed to be working properly.
There is also no reason to add it if we know it doesn't work, it would
just be m
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Sven C. Dack wrote:
> On 19/10/16 12:00, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Sven C. Dack
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 19/10/16 11:01, Yogender Kumar Gupta wrote:
>>
>> I've send in 3 patches regarding Nvidia stuff (1. check for temp aq,
>> Temporal AQ is implemented in CUDA, not in silicon. So far does the API
(Video SDK 7.0.1) accept the flag without giving any errors. The output
however remains identical currently (tested on a GTX 960). You'll have to
ask Nvidia why they haven't implemented it yet (i'ts probably too soon). I
am
On 19/10/16 12:00, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Sven C. Dack wrote:
On 19/10/16 11:01, Yogender Kumar Gupta wrote:
I've send in 3 patches regarding Nvidia stuff (1. check for temp aq, 2.
option for temp aq in hevc, 3. limitation work-around for scale npp), but
ther
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Sven C. Dack wrote:
> On 19/10/16 11:01, Yogender Kumar Gupta wrote:
I've send in 3 patches regarding Nvidia stuff (1. check for temp aq, 2.
>>
>> option for temp aq in hevc, 3. limitation work-around for scale npp), but
>> there seems to be no maintaine
I'm not exactly maintaining libnpp, I think it was merged from libav,
but the patch looks fine regardless.
No idea why I never got these mails, must have mass-marked them as read
and then deleted all unread mails.
Will apply the old patches as this one does not show up on patchwork.
__
On 19/10/16 11:01, Yogender Kumar Gupta wrote:
I've send in 3 patches regarding Nvidia stuff (1. check for temp aq, 2.
option for temp aq in hevc, 3. limitation work-around for scale npp), but
there seems to be no maintainer present at the moment to pick them up...
Tempoal AQ HEVC not supported
>> This patch LGTM, minus the one spurious space at the end of the if.
What is the procedure to submit, do I do a git push
Thanks,
Yogender
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>> I've send in 3 patches regarding Nvidia stuff (1. check for temp aq, 2.
option for temp aq in hevc, 3. limitation work-around for scale npp), but
there seems to be no maintainer present at the moment to pick them up...
Tempoal AQ HEVC not supported yet.
Thanks,
Yogender
___
On 19/10/16 10:22, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
Am 19.10.2016 um 11:15 schrieb Sven C. Dack:
On 19/10/16 09:34, Yogender Kumar Gupta wrote:
Added capability check for Temporal AQ
Thanks,
Yogender
I've send in 3 patches regarding Nvidia stuff (1. check for temp aq, 2.
option for temp aq in hevc, 3
Am 19.10.2016 um 11:15 schrieb Sven C. Dack:
> On 19/10/16 09:34, Yogender Kumar Gupta wrote:
>> Added capability check for Temporal AQ
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yogender
> I've send in 3 patches regarding Nvidia stuff (1. check for temp aq, 2.
> option for temp aq in hevc, 3. limitation work-around for sca
On 19/10/16 09:34, Yogender Kumar Gupta wrote:
Added capability check for Temporal AQ
Thanks,
Yogender
I've send in 3 patches regarding Nvidia stuff (1. check for temp aq, 2. option
for temp aq in hevc, 3. limitation work-around for scale npp), but there seems
to be no maintainer present at th
Added capability check for Temporal AQ
Thanks,
Yogender
0001-nvenc-Add-capability-check-for-Temporal-AQ.patch
Description: Binary data
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
13 matches
Mail list logo
