Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/4] More H.264 assembly (the sequel) [version 2]

Hi, On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 7:04 AM, James Darnley wrote: > On 2016-12-05 19:32, James Darnley wrote: > > Fixed the problem Michael highlighted. Dropped the intra functions > until it > > becomes clear why their performance is unexpected. Updated the > benchmarks with > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/4] More H.264 assembly (the sequel) [version 2]

On 2016-12-05 19:32, James Darnley wrote: > Fixed the problem Michael highlighted. Dropped the intra functions until it > becomes clear why their performance is unexpected. Updated the benchmarks with > results from a Nehalem and used (slightly) more accurate data. > > Regarding the age of MMX:

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/4] More H.264 assembly (the sequel) [version 2]

Fixed the problem Michael highlighted. Dropped the intra functions until it becomes clear why their performance is unexpected. Updated the benchmarks with results from a Nehalem and used (slightly) more accurate data. Regarding the age of MMX: I have written it so unless someone tells me to