2016-04-29 10:50 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol :
> Should be OK if it doesn't break anything.
I'll resend the current state of this patchset for easier testing &
applying. Michael ran this under valgrind with nothing popping up, and
fate passes.
I think the remaining thing is: is the first version (with
On 4/18/16, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> I think only the 2 first patches are needed, but I prefer the code
> from the 3rd+4th patches. Overall, it's still not the nicest code, and
> valgrind-proofing the patchset is needed (not possible atm for me).
>
> The SSE4 implementation is not worthwhile in
I think only the 2 first patches are needed, but I prefer the code
from the 3rd+4th patches. Overall, it's still not the nicest code, and
valgrind-proofing the patchset is needed (not possible atm for me).
The SSE4 implementation is not worthwhile in my opinion.
Christophe Gisquet (6):
fate: wm
