On Sun, 2015-10-25 at 21:43 +0100, Tomas Härdin wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 19:47 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 23:45:07 +0200
> > Tomas Härdin wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 18:00 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > > Some files such as those from tickets #2817 &
On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 19:47 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 23:45:07 +0200
> Tomas Härdin wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 18:00 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > Some files such as those from tickets #2817 & #2776 claim to have
> > > constant edit unit size but, in fact, ha
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 23:45:07 +0200
Tomas Härdin wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 18:00 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > Some files such as those from tickets #2817 & #2776 claim to have
> > constant edit unit size but, in fact, have some of them that are
> > smaller. This confuses the demuxer that
On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 18:00 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> Some files such as those from tickets #2817 & #2776 claim to have constant
> edit unit size but,
> in fact, have some of them that are smaller. This confuses the demuxer that
> tries to infer the
> current edit unit from the position in t
Some files such as those from tickets #2817 & #2776 claim to have constant edit
unit size but,
in fact, have some of them that are smaller. This confuses the demuxer that
tries to infer the
current edit unit from the position in the file. By trying to increment the
current edit unit
before rejec