Mats Peterson skrev: (7 mars 2016 18:04:34
CET)
>Mats Peterson skrev: (7 mars 2016
>17:49:41 CET)
>>Mats Peterson skrev: (7 mars 2016
>>15:00:29 CET)
>>>Forget the separate patch posted before, and my previous experimental
>
>>>variants of your patch, Michael. And if we're going to use keyframe
Mats Peterson skrev: (7 mars 2016 17:49:41
CET)
>Mats Peterson skrev: (7 mars 2016
>15:00:29 CET)
>>Forget the separate patch posted before, and my previous experimental
>>variants of your patch, Michael. And if we're going to use keyframe
>>xxpc
>>chunks, we'll have to invent something really
Mats Peterson skrev: (7 mars 2016 15:00:29
CET)
>Forget the separate patch posted before, and my previous experimental
>variants of your patch, Michael. And if we're going to use keyframe
>xxpc
>chunks, we'll have to invent something really good. Here is some useful
>
>stuff added in the meanti
Forget the separate patch posted before, and my previous experimental
variants of your patch, Michael. And if we're going to use keyframe xxpc
chunks, we'll have to invent something really good. Here is some useful
stuff added in the meantime.
Mats
--
Mats Peterson
http://matsp888.no-ip.org/~m
