On 2014-03-15 00:01, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 01:03:03PM +0100, James Darnley wrote:
>> +; Is it worth looping correctly over the first samples? The most that ever
>> need
>> +; to be copied is 32 so we might as well just unroll the loop and do all 32.
>
> implementat
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:32:23AM +0200, James Darnley wrote:
> On 2014-03-15 00:01, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 01:03:03PM +0100, James Darnley wrote:
> >> +; Is it worth looping correctly over the first samples? The most that
> >> ever need
> >> +; to be copied is 32
On 2014-07-21 01:48, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:32:23AM +0200, James Darnley wrote:
>> On 2014-03-15 00:01, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 01:03:03PM +0100, James Darnley wrote:
+; Is it worth looping correctly over the first samples? The m
