On 14.03.2015, at 20:08, Christophe Gisquet
wrote:
> 2015-03-14 20:06 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer :
>>> So here's an updated patch.
>>
>> yes, but not in the email ;)
>
> Crap, I prepared the mail in advance, but forgot to attach the patch
> after the fate run.
I kind of object to making th
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 08:08:23PM +0100, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> 2015-03-14 20:06 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer :
> >> So here's an updated patch.
> >
> > yes, but not in the email ;)
>
> Crap, I prepared the mail in advance, but forgot to attach the patch
> after the fate run.
>
> --
> Chr
2015-03-14 20:06 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer :
>> So here's an updated patch.
>
> yes, but not in the email ;)
Crap, I prepared the mail in advance, but forgot to attach the patch
after the fate run.
--
Christophe
From 46f45c02767dcba473197c2b633e3de69385f371 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chr
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 07:57:19PM +0100, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2015-03-14 18:38 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer :
> >> static void ff_prores_idct_wrap(int16_t *dst){
> >> -DECLARE_ALIGNED(16, static int16_t, qmat)[64];
> >> +LOCAL_ALIGNED(16, static int16_t, qmat, [64]);
> >>
Hi,
2015-03-14 18:38 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer :
>> static void ff_prores_idct_wrap(int16_t *dst){
>> -DECLARE_ALIGNED(16, static int16_t, qmat)[64];
>> +LOCAL_ALIGNED(16, static int16_t, qmat, [64]);
>> int i;
>
> this seems to break build
>
> ffmpeg/libavcodec/dct-test.c: In fu
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 03:30:24PM +, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> The later may yield incorrect code for on-stack variables.
> ---
> libavcodec/dct-test.c | 2 +-
> libavcodec/h264_loopfilter.c| 10 +-
> libavcodec/proresenc_anatoliy.c | 3 ++-
> libavcodec/vp8.c
The later may yield incorrect code for on-stack variables.
---
libavcodec/dct-test.c | 2 +-
libavcodec/h264_loopfilter.c| 10 +-
libavcodec/proresenc_anatoliy.c | 3 ++-
libavcodec/vp8.c| 2 +-
4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a
