From: James Darnley
Also adjust alignment requirements where nessecary.
---
Whether this patch is committed or not the change to 4xm.c should be picked to
master because the alignment is wrong for the AVX version of this function. I
assume it hasn't been noticed yet because it manages to be 32-b
2017-11-09 12:58 GMT+01:00 James Darnley :
> From: James Darnley
>
> Also adjust alignment requirements where nessecary.
> ---
> Whether this patch is committed or not the change to 4xm.c should be
> picked to
> master because the alignment is wrong for the AVX version of this
> function. I
> as
On 2017-11-09 20:35, Martin Vignali wrote:
> 2017-11-09 12:58 GMT+01:00 James Darnley :
>
>> From: James Darnley
>>
>> Also adjust alignment requirements where nessecary.
>> ---
>> Whether this patch is committed or not the change to 4xm.c should be
>> picked to
>> master because the alignment is
On 11/10/2017 10:28 AM, James Darnley wrote:
> On 2017-11-09 20:35, Martin Vignali wrote:
>> 2017-11-09 12:58 GMT+01:00 James Darnley :
>>
>>> From: James Darnley
>>>
>>> Also adjust alignment requirements where nessecary.
>>> ---
>>> Whether this patch is committed or not the change to 4xm.c shou