Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] RFC: checkasm: motion: Test different h parameters

2022-08-16 Thread Martin Storsjö
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022, Martin Storsjö wrote: On Wed, 13 Jul 2022, Martin Storsjö wrote: Previously, the checkasm test always passed h=8, so no other cases were tested. Out of the me_cmp functions, in practice, some functions are hardcoded to always assume a 8x8 block (ignoring the h parameter),

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] RFC: checkasm: motion: Test different h parameters

2022-08-04 Thread Martin Storsjö
On Wed, 13 Jul 2022, Martin Storsjö wrote: Previously, the checkasm test always passed h=8, so no other cases were tested. Out of the me_cmp functions, in practice, some functions are hardcoded to always assume a 8x8 block (ignoring the h parameter), while others do use the parameter. For

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] RFC: checkasm: motion: Test different h parameters

2022-07-13 Thread Martin Storsjö
Previously, the checkasm test always passed h=8, so no other cases were tested. Out of the me_cmp functions, in practice, some functions are hardcoded to always assume a 8x8 block (ignoring the h parameter), while others do use the parameter. For those with hardcoded height, both the reference C