On 3/17/2018 11:13 PM, James Almer wrote:
> On 3/17/2018 10:54 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 10:39:25PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>>> On 3/17/2018 10:28 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 08:16:01PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> There's no
On 3/17/2018 10:54 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 10:39:25PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>> On 3/17/2018 10:28 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 08:16:01PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
There's no need to allocate a new packet for it.
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 10:39:25PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 3/17/2018 10:28 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 08:16:01PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> >> There's no need to allocate a new packet for it.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: James Almer
> >> ---
On 3/17/2018 10:28 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 08:16:01PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>> There's no need to allocate a new packet for it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: James Almer
>> ---
>> libavcodec/noise_bsf.c | 30 --
>> 1 file
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 08:16:01PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> There's no need to allocate a new packet for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Almer
> ---
> libavcodec/noise_bsf.c | 30 --
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
should be ok
There's no need to allocate a new packet for it.
Signed-off-by: James Almer
---
libavcodec/noise_bsf.c | 30 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/noise_bsf.c b/libavcodec/noise_bsf.c
index