On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>* On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 09:30:18PM +0200, Marton Balint wrote:
*
>>* We haven't had a stable release since the packet_gap addition, so probably
>>it
*
>>* is worth reworking the option to something that makes more sense to the end
*
>>* user.
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 09:30:18PM +0200, Marton Balint wrote:
We haven't had a stable release since the packet_gap addition, so probably it
is worth reworking the option to something that makes more sense to the end
user. Also add burst_bits opt
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 09:30:18PM +0200, Marton Balint wrote:
> We haven't had a stable release since the packet_gap addition, so probably it
> is worth reworking the option to something that makes more sense to the end
> user. Also add burst_bits option to specify maximum length of bit bursts.
>
We haven't had a stable release since the packet_gap addition, so probably it
is worth reworking the option to something that makes more sense to the end
user. Also add burst_bits option to specify maximum length of bit bursts.
Signed-off-by: Marton Balint
---
doc/protocols.texi| 9 +++-