Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/4] wmavoice: disable bitstream checking.

Hi, On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 07:51:05PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 7:44 PM, Michael Niedermayer > > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/4] wmavoice: disable bitstream checking.

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 07:51:05PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 7:44 PM, Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 05:23:06PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > > The checked bitstream reader does that already. To

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/4] wmavoice: disable bitstream checking.

Hi, On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 7:44 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 05:23:06PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > The checked bitstream reader does that already. To allow parsing of > > superframes split over a packet boundary, we always decode the

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/4] wmavoice: disable bitstream checking.

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 05:23:06PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > The checked bitstream reader does that already. To allow parsing of > superframes split over a packet boundary, we always decode the last > superframe in each packet at the start of the next packet, even if > theoretically we

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/4] wmavoice: disable bitstream checking.

The checked bitstream reader does that already. To allow parsing of superframes split over a packet boundary, we always decode the last superframe in each packet at the start of the next packet, even if theoretically we could have decoded it. The last superframe in the last packet is decoded using