On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 09:22:23PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> Try this attached patch. I have not looked at all samples, as some allocate
> too much memory for my system.
> But this patch points where real bugs are, unlike yours patch which hides
> real bugs even more.
> cfhd.c |7 ++-
I do not have time or motivation to deal with this and similar issues.
But applying band-aid solutions are not step forward.
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 12:53 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 12:49:26AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 12:25:53AM
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 12:49:26AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 12:25:53AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 09:22:23PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > > Try this attached patch. I have not looked at all samples, as some
> > > allocate
> >
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 12:25:53AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 09:22:23PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > Try this attached patch. I have not looked at all samples, as some allocate
> > too much memory for my system.
>
> > But this patch points where real bugs are,
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 09:22:23PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> Try this attached patch. I have not looked at all samples, as some allocate
> too much memory for my system.
> But this patch points where real bugs are, unlike yours patch which hides
> real bugs even more.
I would appreciate if
Try this attached patch. I have not looked at all samples, as some allocate
too much memory for my system.
But this patch points where real bugs are, unlike yours patch which hides
real bugs even more.
From fc4abcc0d0058ea8a7cd79ce26bfbcbed4cf5329 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul B Mahol
Date:
I can not reproduce any crash either with address sanitizer or valgrind
with samples you provided.
Are you sure this apply to master?
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 7:50 PM Paul B Mahol wrote:
> Please share files privately, do not apply non fix for this issue.
>
> Give up with such this non-solution.
Please share files privately, do not apply non fix for this issue.
Give up with such this non-solution.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:49 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 10:15:24PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > This is based on the encoder and a small number of CFHD
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 10:15:24PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> This is based on the encoder and a small number of CFHD sample files
> It should make the decoder more robust against crafted input.
> Due to the lack of a proper specification it is possible that this
> may be too strict and
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 3:59 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 10:52:03AM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 10:27 PM Michael Niedermayer
>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 10:18:40PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > > > Unacceptable, please
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 10:52:03AM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 10:27 PM Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 10:18:40PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > > Unacceptable, please share privately sample that allows to reproduce
> > this.
> >
> > shared
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 10:27 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 10:18:40PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > Unacceptable, please share privately sample that allows to reproduce
> this.
>
> shared the ones which reproduce.
>
> Please explain why this patch is unacceptable to
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 10:18:40PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> Unacceptable, please share privately sample that allows to reproduce this.
shared the ones which reproduce.
Please explain why this patch is unacceptable to you.
the CFHD decoder decodes header elements in the order in which they
Unacceptable, please share privately sample that allows to reproduce this.
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 10:16 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> This is based on the encoder and a small number of CFHD sample files
> It should make the decoder more robust against crafted input.
> Due to the lack of a
This is based on the encoder and a small number of CFHD sample files
It should make the decoder more robust against crafted input.
Due to the lack of a proper specification it is possible that this
may be too strict and may need to be tuned as files not following this
ordering are found.
Fixes:
15 matches
Mail list logo
