2017-09-02 20:17 GMT+02:00 Clément Bœsch :
> From: Clément Bœsch
>
> Refer to "checkasm: use perf API on Linux ARM*" commit for the
> rationale.
>
> The implementation is somehow duplicated with checkasm, but so is the
> current usage of AV_READ_TIME(). Until these implementations and
> heuristics
On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 08:30:24PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 08:17:40PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> > From: Clément Bœsch
> >
> > Refer to "checkasm: use perf API on Linux ARM*" commit for the
> > rationale.
> >
> > The implementation is somehow duplicated wit
On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 08:17:40PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> From: Clément Bœsch
>
> Refer to "checkasm: use perf API on Linux ARM*" commit for the
> rationale.
>
> The implementation is somehow duplicated with checkasm, but so is the
> current usage of AV_READ_TIME(). Until these implementa
From: Clément Bœsch
Refer to "checkasm: use perf API on Linux ARM*" commit for the
rationale.
The implementation is somehow duplicated with checkasm, but so is the
current usage of AV_READ_TIME(). Until these implementations and
heuristics are made consistent, I don't see a way of sharing that c
