On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 02:50:37PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 8/19/14, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> > The allocation didn't account for headers, that can be easily 79 bytes.
> > As a result, buffers allocated for a few samples (e.g. 5 in the original
> > bug) could be undersized.
> >
> > Fixed
On 8/19/14, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> The allocation didn't account for headers, that can be easily 79 bytes.
> As a result, buffers allocated for a few samples (e.g. 5 in the original
> bug) could be undersized.
>
> Fixed ticket #2881.
> ---
> libavcodec/wavpackenc.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file change
The allocation didn't account for headers, that can be easily 79 bytes.
As a result, buffers allocated for a few samples (e.g. 5 in the original
bug) could be undersized.
Fixed ticket #2881.
---
libavcodec/wavpackenc.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libav