Hi,
2015-10-05 10:57 GMT+02:00 tim nicholson :
> I thought JJ had got hold of a copy of the specs...
He was quick to notice the 2014 ones do not cover DNxHR. But the
bitstream doesn't seem to depart that much from the old stuff, and
ffmpeg's output after this patch series seems adequate.
--
Chr
On 05/10/15 08:51, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2015-10-05 8:44 GMT+02:00 tim nicholson :
>> On 02/10/15 20:00, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
>>> A series of 0 in a table can be confusing, and the corresponding checks
>>> strange, so using a macro instead of that magic is more readable.
>>> ---
Hi,
2015-10-05 8:44 GMT+02:00 tim nicholson :
> On 02/10/15 20:00, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
>> A series of 0 in a table can be confusing, and the corresponding checks
>> strange, so using a macro instead of that magic is more readable.
>> ---
>> libavcodec/dnxhddata.c | 10 +-
>> libavco
On 02/10/15 20:00, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> A series of 0 in a table can be confusing, and the corresponding checks
> strange, so using a macro instead of that magic is more readable.
> ---
> libavcodec/dnxhddata.c | 10 +-
> libavcodec/dnxhddata.h | 3 +++
> libavcodec/dnxhddec.c |
A series of 0 in a table can be confusing, and the corresponding checks
strange, so using a macro instead of that magic is more readable.
---
libavcodec/dnxhddata.c | 10 +-
libavcodec/dnxhddata.h | 3 +++
libavcodec/dnxhddec.c | 6 --
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(
