On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 06:00:21PM +0100, Josh de Kock wrote:
[...]
> Should I be replacing sdl.c instead of creating sdl2.c? This comes
> under a more semantic question: should it be called SDL2?
I'd say replace sdl.c and use .name = "sdl,sdl2"?
It would be a shame to keep the SDL1 dependency an
Hi,
I'm trying to update the usages of SDL1 to SDL2 so that they can
follow the new library, as the last version was released in 2013,
and is probably becoming a bit stale. While this should be a
fairly simple patch (for others), I'm having a little trouble with
it, and it was suggested that I pos
