On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 01:59:32PM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> Quoting Zhao Zhili (2024-08-26 13:52:41)
> >
> >
> > > On Aug 24, 2024, at 22:40, Matthieu Bouron
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Diff with the v1:
> > > - dropped support of ENCODING_PCM_24BIT_PACKED as it uses 3 conse
Quoting Zhao Zhili (2024-08-26 13:52:41)
>
>
> > On Aug 24, 2024, at 22:40, Matthieu Bouron
> > wrote:
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Diff with the v1:
> > - dropped support of ENCODING_PCM_24BIT_PACKED as it uses 3 consecutive
> > bytes
> > for one sample and there is no direct AVSampleFormat equival
> On Aug 24, 2024, at 22:40, Matthieu Bouron wrote:
>
> ---
>
> Diff with the v1:
> - dropped support of ENCODING_PCM_24BIT_PACKED as it uses 3 consecutive bytes
> for one sample and there is no direct AVSampleFormat equivalent (that would
> require a dedicated copy routine to copy the 3 by
---
Diff with the v1:
- dropped support of ENCODING_PCM_24BIT_PACKED as it uses 3 consecutive bytes
for one sample and there is no direct AVSampleFormat equivalent (that would
require a dedicated copy routine to copy the 3 bytes into the 4 bytes
provided by AV_SAMPLE_FMT_S32). I believe this
