From: softworkz
These tests:
- vsynth2-mpeg2-422
- vsynth1-mpeg2-422
- vsynth_lena-mpeg2-422
were failing on newer CPUs where av_cpu_max_align() returns
values > 32. This patch sets cpuflags to disable avx512
extensions for those tests only.
Signed-off-by: softworkz
---
tests/fate/vcodec:
On Sat, 28 May 2022, 11:20 softworkz, wrote:
> From: softworkz
>
> These tests:
>
> - vsynth2-mpeg2-422
> - vsynth1-mpeg2-422
> - vsynth_lena-mpeg2-422
>
> were failing on newer CPUs where av_cpu_max_align() returns
> values > 32. This patch sets cpuflags to disable avx512
> extensions for those
From: Kieran Kunhya
Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2022 3:11 PM
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
Cc: softworkz
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] tests/fate/vcodec: Limit mem alignment
for vsynth..mpeg2-422 tests
On Sat, 28 May 2022, 11:20 softworkz,
mailto:ffmpegag
Quoting Soft Works (2022-05-28 15:17:54)
> Do you have a better idea?
>
> The one advantage of this method is that you don’t need to change compilation
> parameters
> nor any source code. It’s only a runtime flag being set only for this
> specific family of tests.
At the very least, I would ex
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of
> Anton Khirnov
> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2022 9:35 AM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches de...@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] tests/fate/vcodec: Limit mem
> alignment for
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of
> Soft Works
> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2022 10:08 AM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches de...@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] tests/fate/vcodec: Limit mem
> alignment for
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of
> Anton Khirnov
> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2022 9:35 AM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches de...@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] tests/fate/vcodec: Limit mem
> alignment for
> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] tests/fate/vcodec: Limit mem
> > alignment for vsynth..mpeg2-422 tests
> >
> > Quoting Soft Works (2022-05-28 15:17:54)
> > > Do you have a better idea?
> > >
> > > The one advantage of this method is tha
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of
> Paul B Mahol
> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2022 11:07 AM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches de...@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] tests/fate/vcodec: Limit mem
> alignment for
ubject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] tests/fate/vcodec: Limit mem
> > alignment for vsynth..mpeg2-422 tests
> >
> > Quoting Soft Works (2022-05-28 15:17:54)
> > > Do you have a better idea?
> > >
> > > The one advantage of this method is that you don’t n
ubject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] tests/fate/vcodec: Limit mem
> > alignment for vsynth..mpeg2-422 tests
> >
> > Quoting Soft Works (2022-05-28 15:17:54)
> > > Do you have a better idea?
> > >
> > > The one advantage of this method is that you don’t n
Quoting Soft Works (2022-05-30 11:26:56)
> Well, the test .mak files are full of hacks then, with the many super-
> special flags in place that do not reflect any real world use at all.
There are AFAIK zero tests that override cpuflags.
>
> That flag does nothing more than to assure that the tes
patches >> de...@ffmpeg.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] tests/fate/vcodec: Limit mem
>>> alignment for vsynth..mpeg2-422 tests
>>>
>>> Quoting Soft Works (2022-05-28 15:17:54)
>>>> Do you have a better idea?
>>>>
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of
> Anton Khirnov
> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2022 12:24 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches de...@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] tests/fate/vcodec: Limit mem
> alignment for
14 matches
Mail list logo
