On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 08:32:18AM +0800, Jiejun Zhang wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> >
> > seeking still fails with this and the sample from #6584 is that
> > intended or a seperate issue ?
>
> I didn't see any failure using "./ffmpeg -ss 00:00:10" (and
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
>
> seeking still fails with this and the sample from #6584 is that
> intended or a seperate issue ?
I didn't see any failure using "./ffmpeg -ss 00:00:10" (and also other
time from 0s to 20s). How to reproduce a seeking failure?
___
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:59:11PM +0800, zhangjiejun1...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Jiejun Zhang
>
> When an edit list exists in a MOV file, counting by stscs no longer
> works because stscs' order is different from the actual timeline. This
> commit adds stsd-change markers to the actual timeline
2017-08-17 12:59 GMT+08:00 :
> From: Jiejun Zhang
>
> When an edit list exists in a MOV file, counting by stscs no longer
> works because stscs' order is different from the actual timeline. This
> commit adds stsd-change markers to the actual timeline and changes stsd
> according to these markers
From: Jiejun Zhang
When an edit list exists in a MOV file, counting by stscs no longer
works because stscs' order is different from the actual timeline. This
commit adds stsd-change markers to the actual timeline and changes stsd
according to these markers.
---
libavformat/isom.h | 14 +--
