> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Nicolas
> George
> Sent: Friday, 17 September 2021 15:07
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v5 00/12] Subtitle Filtering
>
> Soft Works (12021-09-17):
&
Soft Works (12021-09-17):
> I'm not talking about any fantasy or idea. I'm describing the
> behaviour of my v6 patch.
Then your v6 patch, like all other versions, is completely bogus.
And again, I do not have time to give to you. I already have more than a
hundred students this year, and at
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Nicolas
> George
> Sent: Friday, 17 September 2021 09:34
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v5 00/12] Subtitle Filtering
>
> Soft Works (12021-09-17):
&
Soft Works (12021-09-17):
> I'd like to add a few more details about that subject.
I do not have time to say anything to you more than:
That is not how filtering works. The timestamps of the frames matter.
--
Nicolas George
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Soft Works
> Sent: Friday, 17 September 2021 06:35
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v5 00/12] Subtitle Filtering
>
>
>
> > -Original Messa
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of
> Soft Works
> Sent: Thursday, 16 September 2021 19:46
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches de...@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v5 00/12] Subtitle Filtering
>
[..]
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of
> Hendrik Leppkes
> Sent: Wednesday, 15 September 2021 11:21
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches de...@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v5 00/12] Subtitle Filtering
>
> On W
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of
> Nicolas George
> Sent: Thursday, 16 September 2021 12:20
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches de...@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v5 00/12] Subtitle Filtering
>
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 12:20:17PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> Hendrik Leppkes (12021-09-15):
> > Or perhaps some people have a day job, a life and other obligations
> > that prevent them from spending time on FFmpeg every day, especially
> > outside the weekend.
> > But no, that can't be it,
Hendrik Leppkes (12021-09-15):
> Or perhaps some people have a day job, a life and other obligations
> that prevent them from spending time on FFmpeg every day, especially
> outside the weekend.
> But no, that can't be it, surely we are all just evil. /s
> Nothing here is being invented. You are
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of
> Hendrik Leppkes
> Sent: Wednesday, 15 September 2021 11:21
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches de...@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v5 00/12] Subtitle Filtering
>
> On W
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 9:39 AM Soft Works wrote:
>
> In my upcoming patchset, I have added a new struct AVSubtitleArea
> which is similar to AVSubtitleRect with the difference that
>
> - It's not AVSubtitleRect (which can be deprecated then)
> - It uses refcounted buffers for the image data
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of
> Soft Works
> Sent: Wednesday, 15 September 2021 09:39
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches de...@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v5 00/12] Subtitle Filtering
>
[..]
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of
> Hendrik Leppkes
> Sent: Wednesday, 15 September 2021 08:11
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches de...@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v5 00/12] Subtitle Filtering
>
> On W
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 1:21 AM Soft Works wrote:
>
> Hendrik,
>
> I can't avoid to note that your reply pattern is a bit similar to
> what I've seen before here: long texts trying to point out one's
> authority, naming rejection conditions, trying to discourage instead
> of encourage and finally
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of
> Soft Works
> Sent: Sunday, 12 September 2021 22:33
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches de...@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v5 00/12] Subtitle Filtering
>
>
&
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of
> Hendrik Leppkes
> Sent: Sunday, 12 September 2021 22:15
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches de...@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v5 00/12] Subtitle Filtering
>
> On Su
On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 10:07 PM Soft Works wrote:
>
> All-in-all that doesn't seem to be worth all the hazzle. Again,
> that brings me back to my original approach:
>
It is for us, if its not for you, what can we say.
The only approach to go forwards is to prepare proper, clean and fully
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of
> Hendrik Leppkes
> Sent: Sunday, 12 September 2021 07:30
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches de...@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v5 00/12] Subtitle Filtering
>
> On S
On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 6:21 AM Soft Works wrote:
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of
> > Soft Works
> > Sent: Sunday, 12 September 2021 05:21
> > To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> > Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of
> Soft Works
> Sent: Sunday, 12 September 2021 05:21
> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v5 00/12] Subtitle Filtering
>
> v5 Update:
>
> - Merge AVSubtitle into AVFrame
v5 Update:
- Merge AVSubtitle into AVFrame
- Move FATE test adjustments to corresponding commit
- Move documentation updates to corresponding filter commits
- Remove mediatype parameter from av_frame_get_buffer2
(still need some advice for splitting the commits in a way that
every single one
22 matches
Mail list logo
