On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 05:52:00PM -0400, Patrick Keroulas wrote:
> This codec is already capable of depacking some combinations of pixel
> formats and depth as defined in the RFC4175. The only difference between
> progressive and interlace is that either a packet will contain the whole
> frame, or
This codec is already capable of depacking some combinations of pixel
formats and depth as defined in the RFC4175. The only difference between
progressive and interlace is that either a packet will contain the whole
frame, or only a field of the frame.
There is no mechanism for interlaced frames r
