Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Initial tickering at unifying ProRes encoder

2024-01-10 Thread Clément Bœsch
On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 11:56:56AM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote: > On date Monday 2023-12-11 02:35:01 +0100, Clément Bœsch wrote: > > Hello there, > > > > I'm currently investigating an issue¹ affecting Kostya ProRes encoder > > which is not reproducible with Anatoliy encoder (but it's too early

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Initial tickering at unifying ProRes encoder

2023-12-24 Thread Stefano Sabatini
On date Monday 2023-12-11 02:35:01 +0100, Clément Bœsch wrote: > Hello there, > > I'm currently investigating an issue¹ affecting Kostya ProRes encoder > which is not reproducible with Anatoliy encoder (but it's too early to > say if the bug is not present there as well given the differences in >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Initial tickering at unifying ProRes encoder

2023-12-11 Thread Clément Bœsch
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 10:15:09AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > Quoting Clément Bœsch (2023-12-11 02:35:01) > > Hello there, > > > > I'm currently investigating an issue¹ affecting Kostya ProRes encoder > > which is not reproducible with Anatoliy encoder (but it's too early to > > say if the bug

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Initial tickering at unifying ProRes encoder

2023-12-11 Thread Anton Khirnov
Quoting Clément Bœsch (2023-12-11 02:35:01) > Hello there, > > I'm currently investigating an issue¹ affecting Kostya ProRes encoder > which is not reproducible with Anatoliy encoder (but it's too early to > say if the bug is not present there as well given the differences in > quantization, and

[FFmpeg-devel] Initial tickering at unifying ProRes encoder

2023-12-10 Thread Clément Bœsch
Hello there, I'm currently investigating an issue¹ affecting Kostya ProRes encoder which is not reproducible with Anatoliy encoder (but it's too early to say if the bug is not present there as well given the differences in quantization, and it's also unclear if the issue is even actually there in