Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Mailman3 Upgrade

2025-08-19 Thread Timo Rothenpieler via ffmpeg-devel
On 19/08/2025 08:55, Martin Storsjö via ffmpeg-devel wrote: On Tue, 19 Aug 2025, Timo Rothenpieler via ffmpeg-devel wrote: mailman2 has no good way to deal with that in a more reasonable way. Mailman3 is already set up, and can be migrated to at a moments notice. The only problem with it is tha

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Mailman3 Upgrade

2025-08-18 Thread Martin Storsjö via ffmpeg-devel
On Tue, 19 Aug 2025, Timo Rothenpieler via ffmpeg-devel wrote: mailman2 has no good way to deal with that in a more reasonable way. Mailman3 is already set up, and can be migrated to at a moments notice. The only problem with it is that I really don't like the new archives. It has ways to better

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Mailman3 Upgrade

2025-08-18 Thread James Almer via ffmpeg-devel
On 8/18/2025 7:08 PM, Timo Rothenpieler via ffmpeg-devel wrote: Hi! As you might have noticed, a bunch of big Mail-Hosters have introduced new, even stricter, requirements. Primarily it's Microsoft, but others seem to already have followed suit. So we had to configure the list to send all mail

[FFmpeg-devel] Mailman3 Upgrade

2025-08-18 Thread Timo Rothenpieler via ffmpeg-devel
Hi! As you might have noticed, a bunch of big Mail-Hosters have introduced new, even stricter, requirements. Primarily it's Microsoft, but others seem to already have followed suit. So we had to configure the list to send all mails as coming from the list itself. At least to me this seems hi