On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 09:04:41AM +0100, Mickaël Raulet wrote:
> Looks good to me. Looks like an evil bitstream.
applied
thanks
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Those who are best at talking, realize last or never when they are wrong.
signatur
Looks good to me. Looks like an evil bitstream.
Mickaël
> Le 11 nov. 2014 à 03:54, Timothy Gu a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> On Monday, November 10, 2014, WeiChangjiang
> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>> The attached is a very minor fix for hevc decoder. For big negative
>> motion vector, namely, mv_y, the
Hi,
On Monday, November 10, 2014, WeiChangjiang
wrote:
> Hi guys,
> The attached is a very minor fix for hevc decoder. For big negative
> motion vector, namely, mv_y, the hevc_await_progress will use a negative
> value for ff_thread_await_progress while it should be 0 because it needs to
> wai
Hi guys,
The attached is a very minor fix for hevc decoder. For big negative motion
vector, namely, mv_y, the hevc_await_progress will use a negative value for
ff_thread_await_progress while it should be 0 because it needs to wait the
first line of ref frame to do ege extending.
regards,Chang
