Re: [FFmpeg-devel] PATCH for building with nasm

2017-01-02 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 10:54:18AM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 8:36 PM, Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 08:16:00AM +, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > > > On 1 January 2017 at 07:52, John Comeau wrote: > > > > > > > fixes `operatio

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] PATCH for building with nasm

2017-01-02 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi, On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 8:36 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 08:16:00AM +, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > > On 1 January 2017 at 07:52, John Comeau wrote: > > > > > fixes `operation size not specified` errors as described here: > > > http://stackoverflow.com/quest

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] PATCH for building with nasm

2017-01-01 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 08:16:00AM +, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > On 1 January 2017 at 07:52, John Comeau wrote: > > > fixes `operation size not specified` errors as described here: > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/36854583/compiling- > > ffmpeg-for-kali-linux-2 > > > > I rebuilt agai

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] PATCH for building with nasm

2017-01-01 Thread John Comeau
On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > 2017-01-01 17:02 GMT+01:00 John Comeau : >> nasm version 2.11.05, which is current in Debian stable. I could use >> 2.12.01 from sid, but should that be a requirement? > > I thought 2.11 has more issues with FFmpeg, or was that only on osx

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] PATCH for building with nasm

2017-01-01 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
2017-01-01 17:02 GMT+01:00 John Comeau : > nasm version 2.11.05, which is current in Debian stable. I could use > 2.12.01 from sid, but should that be a requirement? I thought 2.11 has more issues with FFmpeg, or was that only on osx? Please avoid top-posting here, Carl Eugen

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] PATCH for building with nasm

2017-01-01 Thread John Comeau
nasm version 2.11.05, which is current in Debian stable. I could use 2.12.01 from sid, but should that be a requirement? On 1/1/17, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > On 1 January 2017 at 07:52, John Comeau wrote: > >> fixes `operation size not specified` errors as described here: >> http://stackove

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] PATCH for building with nasm

2017-01-01 Thread Rostislav Pehlivanov
On 1 January 2017 at 07:52, John Comeau wrote: > fixes `operation size not specified` errors as described here: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/36854583/compiling- > ffmpeg-for-kali-linux-2 > > I rebuilt again with yasm and made sure it didn't break that. > -- > John Comeau KE5TFZ j...@unter