On Thu, Apr 30, 2015, at 03:01 PM, loeff...@eyetrap.net wrote:
> I am trying to concat ProRes clips (no audio) into one file.
You will probably have better luck with the concat demuxer.
https://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-formats.html#concat-1
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Concatenate
> ffmpeg version 1.1.
Hello All,
I am trying to concat ProRes clips (no audio) into one file. Here is
my command:
ffmpeg -i
"concat:/storage/HD_24P/HD_24P_DN002__part_0_.mov|/storage/HD_24P/HD_24P_DN002__part_1_.mov|/storage/HD_24P/HD_24P_DN002__part_2_.mov|/storage/HD_24P/HD_24P_DN002__part_3_.mov|/storage/HD_2
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, Christoph Gerstbauer wrote:
I found out that a IMX50 mxf file encoded with FFmbc and the IMX50 mxf file
encoded with actual ffmpeg builds are different in these mxf metadata flags
(by reading out via ffprobe - show_streams)
FFMBC IMX FILE stream 0:0:
color_range=tv
color
Le primidi 11 floréal, an CCXXIII, Alfredo Di Napoli a écrit :
> We have given ffmpeg max priority with “nice -20”, if that matters.
Note that "nice -20" is short for "nice -n 20", that means more than the max
niceness, or in other words the min priority.
(That is, assuming the process starts at
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:06:03 +0800
Kai Hendry wrote:
> Wow, so you've not seen a -report like this?
> http://s.natalian.org/2015-04-30/ffmpeg-20150430-102645.log
The -report option creates an output using the "verbose" loglevel
resulting in such a large output. It is oft
Am 30.04.15 um 00:08 schrieb kevin:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:08 PM, kevin wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:12 AM, kevin wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:11 AM, Matthieu Bouron <
>>> matthieu.bou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos
Am 30.04.2015 um 12:52 schrieb Alfredo Di Napoli:
Hello guys,
We are running a transcoding server on top of FFmpeg, where in principle
the machine can get quite
busy in more than 1 concurrent job is submitted.
Is it possible that a machine under heavy load might affect the goodness of
FFmpeg t
Hi, Alfredo,
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:52:58 +0200, Alfredo Di Napoli wrote:
> Is it possible that a machine under heavy load might affect the goodness of
> FFmpeg transcoding output?
Technically: no.
> In other terms, is a video transcoding a function of the load of a machine
> at a give time?
Hello guys,
We are running a transcoding server on top of FFmpeg, where in principle
the machine can get quite
busy in more than 1 concurrent job is submitted.
Is it possible that a machine under heavy load might affect the goodness of
FFmpeg transcoding output?
In other terms, is a video transco
[Your responses are backwards. That makes reading ... awkward.]
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:33:34 -0400, Shlomo Morosow wrote:
> > https://www.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-utils.html#Expression-Evaluation
Where does it say that epressions are expressed as such?
"%{expr\\\: (10-1)}"
> > I regularly use th
The first link was supposed to be this one
https://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-filters.html#Text-expansion
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Shlomo Morosow
wrote:
> Sorry email was sent before complete:
>
> https://www.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-utils.html#Expression-Evaluation
>
> I regularly use this in many fil
Sorry email was sent before complete:
https://www.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-utils.html#Expression-Evaluation
I regularly use this in many filters and it works just as expected, it's
just that I ran into an issue with the fade filter.
Thanks,
Shlomo
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Shlomo Morosow
wrot
Thanks Moritz,
The reason I need to use mathematical values is because I'd like to make a
preset command to fade out the last second of any given video and since the
fade filter needs to be instructed on when to begin in relation to the
start of the video I need to be able to tell it to start at du
Thanks for the help. It's making a bit of sense now. It looks like my
keyframes are 1/3 of a second. Is less than 2 seconds apart ok?
In the pict_type field I'm seeing B's and P's with one I. Does that
translate to how far apart they are?
[FRAME]
pkt_pts_time=244.70
pkt_dts_time=244.700
On 4/30/2015 8:22 AM, Chris Zecco wrote:
Thanks Moritz,
Would I enter this right into my command prompt, or would I create a separate file to run
this statement from? I keep getting an error saying "File unexpected at this
time". Apologies for any ignorance. I am new to using the command win
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Werner Robitza
wrote:
> There are many ways to get Bash on Windows.
I should add that you can also transform this into a Windows Batch
file, or a Java program that does the looping and executes ffmpeg.
What's important is that ffmpeg on its own cannot do what you
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Chris Zecco wrote:
>
> Thanks Moritz,
>
> Would I enter this right into my command prompt, or would I create a separate
> file to run this statement from? I keep getting an error saying "File
> unexpected at this time". Apologies for any ignorance. I am new to us
Thanks Moritz,
Would I enter this right into my command prompt, or would I create a separate
file to run this statement from? I keep getting an error saying "File
unexpected at this time". Apologies for any ignorance. I am new to using the
command window, though I do have coding experience in p
roduced, presented as inline in the
>> email. No attachments, no externally linked files that might go away
>
> Wow, so you've not seen a -report like this?
> http://s.natalian.org/2015-04-30/ffmpeg-20150430-102645.log
I'm not opening random links, so no. See this pa
Hello Tim,
I thought it would be better to split up my questions to 2 different
tickets, just to prevent mixing up different issues.
If you are able to delete the first mail, please do it.
Best Regards
Christoph Gerstbauer
Am 30.04.2015 um 09:16 schrieb tim nicholson:
On 30/04/15 07:20, Chri
o externally linked files that might go away
Wow, so you've not seen a -report like this?
http://s.natalian.org/2015-04-30/ffmpeg-20150430-102645.log
>>> You may have overseen one important message in your logs:
>>>> No pixel format specified, yuv422p for H.264 encoding
three links:
> Here is the report log:
> http://s.natalian.org/2015-04-30/ffmpeg-20150430-102645.log
> http://ix.io/icO is what I saw
> Here is the tarball of the output
> http://s.natalian.org/2015-04-30/output.tar.gz
Which of the three is what? Am I supposed to look at them all?
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:21:07 +0100, Tom Evans wrote:
> > I doubt IOS safari is an outdated player.
> I'll let you know - it does not. Almost no hardware accelerated
> playback supports 4:2:2 chroma, certainly no iphone supports anything
> other than 4:2:0. See this (extensive) stackoverflow ans
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Kai Hendry wrote:
> On 30 April 2015 at 15:38, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
>> Yes. You have too many links to external stuff (tarballs, logs [why not
>> attached here?], various scenarios, various requests, and it's unclear
>> what the problem is.
>
> Whoa, I try to b
On 30 April 2015 at 15:38, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
> Yes. You have too many links to external stuff (tarballs, logs [why not
> attached here?], various scenarios, various requests, and it's unclear
> what the problem is.
Whoa, I try to be as detailed as possible and then I get criticized
for inclu
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Joel Lopez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to decipher what the values are in the info presented. I need
> to determine how far apart the keyframes are. 3 seconds is what I hear
> they should be for adaptive bitrate switching.
Anything between 2 and 10 seconds is re
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 17:57:43 -0400, Shlomo Morosow wrote:
> I need the ability to input mathematical values for setting the start time
> (st) on the "fade" filter, I've attempted to use an expression and this
> particular filter does not seem to work with expressions, nor simple math
> as "10*
Hi Kai,
> Before I make a bug report, am I missing something?
Yes. You have too many links to external stuff (tarballs, logs [why not
attached here?], various scenarios, various requests, and it's unclear
what the problem is.
Your only problem report:
> CPU iPhone OS 8_3 like Mac OS X) AppleWeb
On 30/04/15 07:20, Christoph Gerstbauer wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am making tests with IMX50/MXF encodings with FFMBC and FFMPEG. (with
> 24bit audio and 16bit audio)
> [...]
Reeatedly asking the same question in a new thread, without waiting a
resonable time for a reply, is begining to get tedious a
On 29/04/15 22:22, Christoph Gerstbauer wrote:
> I found out that a IMX50 mxf file encoded with FFmbc and the IMX50 mxf
> file encoded with actual ffmpeg builds are different in these mxf
> metadata flags (by reading out via ffprobe - show_streams)
>
> FFMBC IMX FILE stream 0:0:
> color_range=tv
>
On 28/04/15 18:02, Mohammadtorabi wrote:
> Hi,I have created an iFrame only MXF file by the command below using
> [...snipped densely packed forest of words]
Was there a question in there somewhere? I couldn't see the wood for the
trees due to the lack of formating.
--
Tim.
Key Fingerprint 38CF
On 28/04/15 09:20, Christoph Gerstbauer wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am making tests with IMX50/MXF encodings with FFMBC and FFMPEG. (with
> 24bit audio)
> The tests compare the final files with the IRT MXF Analyzer Pro tool to
> be shure to be IRT conform.
> (My used syntax is at the bottom of this mail)
Thank You so much, Moritz...
I am very near to where i wanted to be...
Regards,
Hardik Kanakia
+91 93204 89772
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 22:04:15 +0530, Hardik Kanakia wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I want to export 5.1 channel + Stereo (
33 matches
Mail list logo
