Re: [FFmpeg-user] MPEG-2 video, m2v1 (?) vs mp2v

2016-01-28 Thread Moritz Barsnick
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 08:35:47 -0500, Jason C wrote: > Guys, I'm so sorry. I think I was really tired last night and confused all > of my tests. No problem, we got it figured out. > - What is the "correct" FourCC? mp2v seems like a more reasonable choice > than m2v1. That is an interesting

Re: [FFmpeg-user] MPEG-2 video, m2v1 (?) vs mp2v

2016-01-28 Thread Jason C
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Jason C wrote: > I am wondering if I should file a bug report about the MOV output. Open > questions in that vein, though, are: > - What is the "correct" FourCC? mp2v seems like a more reasonable choice > than m2v1. > - Is it a bug that

[FFmpeg-user] lavfi format negotiation at the "code source" seminar in Paris

2016-01-28 Thread Nicolas George
Hi. I am proud to announce that I have been asked to give a talk at the "code source" seminar at the Jussieu Campus in Paris on February the 17th 2016. This is a computer science / philosophy seminar where people present and explain an interesting program they know well by commenting directly the

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Why is audio sampling rate 22050 not supported for WebM ?

2016-01-28 Thread Shyam Sundar
Thanks guys for info. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

Re: [FFmpeg-user] MPEG-2 video, m2v1 (?) vs mp2v

2016-01-28 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Moritz Barsnick gmx.net> writes: > But indeed, with MOV, the named FourCCs are used, and while > my mplayer *can* play then, VLC refuses to. FourCCs are related to riff / avi. mov / mp4 code points can be found here: http://www.mp4ra.org/codecs.html Since mpeg1video and mpeg2video are not

Re: [FFmpeg-user] MPEG-2 video, m2v1 (?) vs mp2v

2016-01-28 Thread Moritz Barsnick
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 08:53:01 +, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > But the OP is only interested in mov... I cannot find that information in the original e-mail. He is very general and even writes: > My goal is to create an MPEG-2 video (container format doesn't > matter). In the second e-mail he

Re: [FFmpeg-user] MPEG-2 video, m2v1 (?) vs mp2v

2016-01-28 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Moritz Barsnick gmx.net> writes: > That said, I just created a file with mpeg2video as such: > $ ffmpeg -f lavfi -i testsrc2 -c:v mpeg2video -t 5 ffmpeg.mpeg2video.avi But the OP is only interested in mov... Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list

Re: [FFmpeg-user] MPEG-2 video, m2v1 (?) vs mp2v

2016-01-28 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Jason C gmail.com> writes: > My goal is to create an MPEG-2 video > (container format doesn't matter). That is not true... Please provide the command line you tested together with the complete, uncut console output. Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-user

Re: [FFmpeg-user] MPEG-2 video, m2v1 (?) vs mp2v

2016-01-28 Thread Moritz Barsnick
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:25:23 +0100, Moritz Barsnick wrote: > But indeed, with MOV, the named FourCCs are used, and while my mplayer > *can* play then, VLC refuses to. And those FourCCs are not listed here: And I can find reports from the last 10 years saying people have videos with m2v1

Re: [FFmpeg-user] MPEG-2 video, m2v1 (?) vs mp2v

2016-01-28 Thread Jason C
should file a bug report about the MOV output. Open questions in that vein, though, are: - What is the "correct" FourCC? mp2v seems like a more reasonable choice than m2v1. - Is it a bug that mpg2 and mpgv cause MOV output to fail or is that correct behavior? Jason ffmpeg started on 2