Am 19.02.2016 um 04:19 schrieb matt clark:
f you don't know enough about configuring (its not a big deal, I don't
know much also) it means, you don't really need to compile nor build
something from sources (otherwise you'd be an expert already). Its boring
and many times pretty painful process.
> f you don't know enough about configuring (its not a big deal, I don't
> know much also) it means, you don't really need to compile nor build
> something from sources (otherwise you'd be an expert already). Its boring
> and many times pretty painful process. Just use the static daily builds,
do
>
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Lou wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 21:21:54 +0100 (CET)
Marton Balint wrote:
An important thing we miss I think is failover on input and output side.
The same can be said on the output side, if one of the network outputs
blocks or fails for any reason, the other outputs wi
2016-02-18 7:07 GMT+02:00 matt clark :
>
> The error occurred at configure ie before make. I guess something in that
> configure command was trying to call up the bz2 library, but it wasnt
> anything I added. I don't know enough about configuring programs to play
> with the source files or anyth
Am 18.02.2016 um 12:15 schrieb Dmpfbck:
> Conclusion: I must find a way to provide the real timestamp for every
> video frame. It's been recorded within my program, but I can't send it
> along with every frame within a mpjpeg stream. That's why I'm curious if
> there is any other simple streaming p
Dave Rice wrote:
I know mediainfo can probe more than ffmpeg in certain cases - but
I consider interlaced/field order to be quite fundamental and
expected there to be a way to see it that I was missing.
I'm guessing here, but I suspect that MediaInfo may be reporting
interlacement information
Andy Furniss wrote:
Moritz Barsnick wrote:
https://ffmpeg.org/faq.html#Interlaced-video-looks-very-bad-when-encoded-with-ffmpeg_002c-what-is-wrong_003f
Scan type: Interlaced
Original scan type : Progressive
Scan type, store method
> On Feb 18, 2016, at 8:04 AM, Andy Furniss wrote:
>
> Moritz Barsnick wrote:
>> Hi Andy,
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:07:44 +, Andy Furniss wrote:
>>> Just idle messing around, wanted to make an interlaced prores just to
>>> see how players/deinterlacers handled it.
>>
>> Disclaimer:
Anatol wrote:
Following php func might help u:
private static function checkForScanType($ffmpegBin, $srcFileName,
$frames=1000)
{
/*
[Parsed_idet_0 @ 00331de0] Single frame detection: TFF:1 BFF:96
Progressive:2 Undetermined:1
[Parsed_idet_0 @ 00331de0] Multi frame detection: TFF:
Moritz Barsnick wrote:
Hi Andy,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:07:44 +, Andy Furniss wrote:
Just idle messing around, wanted to make an interlaced prores just to
see how players/deinterlacers handled it.
Disclaimer: I know very little about interlace stuff.
I know the command is "wrong" for
Ben Barker bbarker.co.uk> writes:
> Ah...OK it seems the solution was the addition of:
>
> -protocol_whitelist file,udp,rtp
>
> (in my case the SDP points at RTP video transported using UDP)
>
> This only seems to be an issue for any input that needs to access a
> remote video source...? I don
Hi Andy,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:07:44 +, Andy Furniss wrote:
> Just idle messing around, wanted to make an interlaced prores just to
> see how players/deinterlacers handled it.
Disclaimer: I know very little about interlace stuff.
> I know the command is "wrong" for colour etc - just a
Following php func might help u:
private static function checkForScanType($ffmpegBin, $srcFileName,
$frames=1000)
{
/*
[Parsed_idet_0 @ 00331de0] Single frame detection: TFF:1 BFF:96
Progressive:2 Undetermined:1
[Parsed_idet_0 @ 00331de0] Multi frame detection: TFF:0 BFF:100
Progre
Just idle messing around, wanted to make an interlaced prores just to
see how players/deinterlacers handled it.
Below is just a shortened example - also tried some variants + prores_ks
/hq.
My commands all fail in the sense that that ffprobe -show_frames doesn't
show interlaced.
What I
Am 18.02.2016 um 00:27 schrieb Moritz Barsnick:
> I had wondered myself:
> http://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-user/2016-January/030178.html
> (I'm using a "multipart/replace" stream, or whatever that crude MIME
> invention is called.)
>
> So the input option "-use_wallclock_as_timestamps" sho
15 matches
Mail list logo