On 21 Mar 2016, at 18:57, jd1008 wrote:
>
>
> On 03/21/2016 09:51 AM, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 11:36:17 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
>>
>>> highest quality HD 1920x1080
>> You should know better by now to be more specific. E.g. do you have any
>> restriction when it comes to
On 03/21/2016 09:51 AM, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 11:36:17 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
highest quality HD 1920x1080
You should know better by now to be more specific. E.g. do you have any
restriction when it comes to codec? Time to convert? File size?
The best quality with the
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Robert Krüger wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos
> wrote:
>
>> Robert Krüger lesspain.de> writes:
>>
>> > major_brand : mp42
>>
>> > Stream #0:1(und): Audio: pcm_s16be (twos / 0x736F7774)
>>
>> If this is not invalid (I do
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Robert Krüger lesspain.de> writes:
>
> > major_brand : mp42
>
> > Stream #0:1(und): Audio: pcm_s16be (twos / 0x736F7774)
>
> If this is not invalid (I don't know) than the issue remains
> that FFmpeg does not write mp42 files
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 15:59:04 +0100, Robert Krüger wrote:
>
> > the mp4 muxer currently does not accept pcm in mp4. However, there are
> > several cameras out there, that produce such files. Would it be possible
> to
> > support this op
qw 163.com> writes:
> I want to build ffmpeg without optimization options,
> which means compiling flags uses O0 instead of O1-O3.
This is what --disable-optimizations does here if you
are using gcc.
Compilation without dead code elimination is not supported
(and hopefully won't be).
Please
Robert Krüger lesspain.de> writes:
> major_brand : mp42
> Stream #0:1(und): Audio: pcm_s16be (twos / 0x736F7774)
If this is not invalid (I don't know) than the issue remains
that FFmpeg does not write mp42 files.
Patch welcome, Carl Eugen
__
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 15:59:04 +0100, Robert Krüger wrote:
> the mp4 muxer currently does not accept pcm in mp4. However, there are
> several cameras out there, that produce such files. Would it be possible to
> support this option when using -strict -2?
If the cameras are doing it wrong, why w
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 11:36:17 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> highest quality HD 1920x1080
You should know better by now to be more specific. E.g. do you have any
restriction when it comes to codec? Time to convert? File size?
The best quality with the smallest effort can indeed be achieved if you
let
Hi all,
I need help with replacing audio channels.
I have two sources:
mkv file: video + audio
Stream #0:0: Video: h264 (High 4:2:2), yuv422p, 1920x1080 [SAR 1:1 DAR
16:9], 25 fps, 25 tbr, 1k tbn, 50 tbc (default)
Stream #0:1: Audio: aac (LC), 48000 Hz, mono, fltp (default)
Stream #0
Hi,
the mp4 muxer currently does not accept pcm in mp4. However, there are
several cameras out there, that produce such files. Would it be possible to
support this option when using -strict -2? This way a user could create
non-spec-conformant files but it would not happen, when not explicitly
over
Am 21.03.2016 um 13:37 schrieb qw:
How to build ffmpeg with O0 option?
just specify it in --extra-cflags
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/f
Hi,
I want to build ffmpeg without optimization options, which means compiling
flags uses O0 instead of O1-O3. I use the following command to build ffmpeg,
where O1 is used in config.mak.
./configure --enable-debug --disable-optimizations ..
I want to disable all optimization options to
13 matches
Mail list logo
