On 07/18/2017 12:10 AM, Cley Faye wrote:
Le 18 juil. 2017 05:06, "JD" a écrit :
Can ffmpeg do that?
Like from say 854x356 and transcode it to 1920x1080
without losing high definition (i.e. no blurring as a
result of transcoding to a larger display).
Ffmpeg can do scaling using various algor
On 2017-07-18 16:35, Cley Faye wrote:
> 2017-07-18 16:26 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald <>:
>>
>>
>> Am 18.07.2017 um 16:17 schrieb Phil Rhodes:
>>
>>> Most of the people you are talking to are at least amateur software
>>> engineers
>>>
>>
>> what's wrong with you?
>
>
> I don't think it was meant as
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Cley Faye wrote:
> Le 18 juil. 2017 05:06, "JD" a écrit :
>
> Can ffmpeg do that?
> Like from say 854x356 and transcode it to 1920x1080
> without losing high definition (i.e. no blurring as a
> result of transcoding to a larger display).
>
>
> Ffmpeg can do scal
I would like to hijack this thread and say
How much i respect , love and depend on this community
and as a native EngLish speaker i would like to add
Viva Amatur !
{ forgive the top post i know , i know }
On 7/18/2017 12:11 PM, Bouke / VideoToolShed wrote:
On 18 Jul 2017, at 17:50, Moritz
> On 18 Jul 2017, at 17:50, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
>
>>
>> You guys really are a fucking joke, you know that.
>
> Now, that's an insult. To comedy as well.
Note to self, don’t take a sip and start reading mail.
On the other hand, it was time to clean my screen anyways.
@All:
Lighten up.
Bou
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 15:13:40 +, Phil Rhodes wrote:
> I can't quite believe that I'm a published writer, being lectured on use of
> my native language by a non-native speaker.
Haha, exactly!
> You guys really are a fucking joke, you know that.
Now, that's an insult. To comedy as well.
R
Ok, guys, let's keep a civil tongue and a technical manner of discussing. For
my part, thank you to everyone who responded and special thanks to Anatoly who
resolved the original question for obtaining static manual.
18.07.2017, в 18:13, Phil Rhodes написал(а):
> I can't quite believe that I'm
Am 18.07.2017 um 17:13 schrieb Phil Rhodes:
I can't quite believe that I'm a published writer, being lectured on use of my
native language by a non-native speaker.
You guys really are a fucking joke, you know that
who is "you guys" - just *because* it came from you it can't only taken
insul
I can't quite believe that I'm a published writer, being lectured on use of my
native language by a non-native speaker.
You guys really are a fucking joke, you know that.
P
From: Reindl Harald
To: ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
Sent: Tuesday, 18 July 2017, 16:05
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-user] man
Am 18.07.2017 um 16:57 schrieb Nicolas George:
Le decadi 30 messidor, an CCXXV, Cley Faye a écrit :
I don't think it was meant as an insult
It was probably. This guy has been for years insulting the people who
make, gratis, the software he uses. Just ignore him.
It wooorkkks :)
Thanks a lot! Really :)
Alex
-Original Message-
From: ffmpeg-user [mailto:ffmpeg-user-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On Behalf Of Moritz
Barsnick
Sent: 18 July 2017 00:20
To: FFmpeg user discussions
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-user] Possible bug in TEE muxer.
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1
Le decadi 30 messidor, an CCXXV, Cley Faye a écrit :
> I don't think it was meant as an insult
It was probably. This guy has been for years insulting the people who
make, gratis, the software he uses. Just ignore him.
> (like amateurish)
Professionals: per
It's not my job to teach you English. There is nothing even remotely offensive
about the phrasology I used.
P
From: Reindl Harald
To: ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
Sent: Tuesday, 18 July 2017, 15:26
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-user] man ffmpeg absent
Am 18.07.2017 um 16:17 schrieb Phil Rhodes:
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 16:45:39 +0300
ILJA SHEBALIN wrote:
> Anatoly, thanks for such an informative response. It looks like its
> tougher than I thought with all this compiling and alike.
Compiling may need little knowledge, but using port system to do that
must be simple. Automated builds is a pur
2017-07-18 16:26 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald :
>
>
> Am 18.07.2017 um 16:17 schrieb Phil Rhodes:
>
>> Most of the people you are talking to are at least amateur software
>> engineers
>>
>
> what's wrong with you?
I don't think it was meant as an insult (like amateurish), but more like
"enthusiast".
Am 18.07.2017 um 16:17 schrieb Phil Rhodes:
Most of the people you are talking to are at least amateur software engineers
what's wrong with you?
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To u
Hi Ilja
I hope this will clarify some of the advice you've received here.
Most of the people you are talking to are at least amateur software engineers
or enthusiasts who are used to compiling software, and who have spent some
effort to build a system which allows them to do so. Setting up a syst
Am 18.07.2017 um 15:45 schrieb ILJA SHEBALIN:
Anatoly, thanks for such an informative response. It looks like its tougher than I thought with all
this compiling and alike. I think I forgot to mention that I wanted something as online independent
as .docset. One more question: when I type "ffm
Anatoly, thanks for such an informative response. It looks like its tougher
than I thought with all this compiling and alike. I think I forgot to mention
that I wanted something as online independent as .docset. One more question:
when I type "ffmpeg --help" (with a bunch of options) I see some
I have few format files and need to perform merge operation on them.
MP4 format concatenate working fine but for MPEG , MTS it's giving me jerk
at two merge points. I used -copy command without re-encoding and combine
those from files from text file containing path & name of those files.
Those vide
The latest nightly of Handbrake includes an option to add the sample group atom
as well as the edit list. This is much more successful than the current ffmpeg
mux when playing in QT X. Its still ignored in older QT decoders, but certainly
this would be an improvement if ffmpeg could follow the H
2017-07-17 23:32 GMT+02:00 ILJA SHEBALIN :
> What advantage does the bundle have over bare bone binary executables
> (UNIX execs in this case)? Do they enhance my experience supplementing
> basic features with extra ones?
For starter, using a decent package manager provides a mean to install ma
22 matches
Mail list logo
