Hello All,
Thanks to Ralph Spitzner generous contribution of space on his server, the
notation has a new home
http://videonotation.spitzner.org
including specimen pictures to illustrate the elements of the notation.
Thank you, Ralph.
___
ffmpeg-user
On 2022-02-09 09:42, Bouke / edit 'B wrote:
On 9 Feb 2022, at 18:32, Mark Filipak wrote:
Hello, All,
Bye Mark.go away!
Now. No time to waste. ...[inappropriate violent content deleted]... I don’t
care, just, stop.
Bouke:
This post violates the project's code of conduct, and is not accept
> On 9 Feb 2022, at 18:32, Mark Filipak wrote:
>
> Hello, All,
Bye Mark.go away!
Now. No time to waste. Unsub / close your internet account / kill yourself /
hire someone to do that for you, I don’t care, just, stop.
Bouke
___
ffmpeg-user mailing
On 2/9/2022 1:17 AM, Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user wrote:
At some point I start to question whether some people on this list are
speaking some private, special language that looks like English but in
which all these pointless unprovoked attacks are somehow reasonable.
They're not. Paul, you are the
Hello, All,
I woke up this morning with this thought:
The video notation reads like music, eh? But instead of making 'music', it describes/modifies
existing 'music': The stream of pictures that come out of decoder. Like music notation, the video
notation is purely object-oriented: the 'music' i
I encode camera images with several parallel H.264 baseline I-frame only
encoder cores in FPGA (more parallel cores are required to get the encoding
done fast enough without external memory). I use an opensource
[encoder][1]. On simulator I use 352x288 yuv420 input image and I slice it
to 2 horizon
> On 2022-02-08 00:19, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> Your "nice" words will not help you gain any credibility here, instead it
> will just make users leave list.
At some point I start to question whether some people on this list are speaking
some private, special language that looks like English but in w
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 11:07 AM Jim DeLaHunt
wrote:
> On 2022-02-08 00:19, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>
> > Please stop spamming this mailing list with unrelated stuff.
>
> Paul:
>
> Mark's stuff is not unrelated. Mark asked nicely if people were
> interested in his stuff. Multiple people said yes. His
