Am 10.03.22 um 22:41 schrieb CMG DiGiTaL:
it adjusts the *general volume* of a track
it's thes ame as touch the volume vontrol
typically it *lowers* the volume of every file
ok Reindl,
It could be that these files were already peaking high and I just realized
now that I'm
paying more
>
> it adjusts the *general volume* of a track
> it's thes ame as touch the volume vontrol
> typically it *lowers* the volume of every file
>
ok Reindl,
It could be that these files were already peaking high and I just realized
now that I'm
paying more attention to my audio volumes.
thanks
>
>
> Yeah, this place seems kind of strange. Attacking people is ok, but don't
> you dare top post! Heh.
>
I fully agree with you!
>
> I understand what Clayton said about the volume on the amplifier, but
>
>
Thank you Clayton,
Got what I meant! ... as I have some very very low FLAC's,
Am 10.03.22 um 17:17 schrieb CMG DiGiTaL:
mp3gain, not what I want, even with its controls, I ended up needing to
control some peaks of the music after using it
nosense!
it adjusts the *general volume* of a track
it's thes ame as touch the volume vontrol
typically it *lowers* the volume
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 8:17 AM CMG DiGiTaL wrote:
> Ok boys each one has its truth and the sum of them, makes us reach
> excellence!... but in the end,
> we must be faithful to what seems most correct to us.
>
>
Yeah, this place seems kind of strange. Attacking people is ok, but don't
you
Ok boys each one has its truth and the sum of them, makes us reach
excellence!... but in the end,
we must be faithful to what seems most correct to us.
Before starting this topic, I had done a lot of testing with software and
plugins related to LUFS normalization:
- The plugin I specified
Am 10.03.22 um 10:17 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:10 AM Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 10.03.22 um 09:54 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:46 AM Reindl Harald
wrote:
your "FFmpeg is right tool for this jobs. You just do not
know how to use it" comes from the
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:10 AM Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 10.03.22 um 09:54 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:46 AM Reindl Harald
> > wrote:
> >> your "FFmpeg is right tool for this jobs. You just do not
> >> know how to use it" comes from the viewpoint that you don't
Am 10.03.22 um 09:54 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:46 AM Reindl Harald
wrote:
your "FFmpeg is right tool for this jobs. You just do not
know how to use it" comes from the viewpoint that you don't know
anything else than ffmpeg - period
Pathethic, I could say same thing
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:46 AM Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 10.03.22 um 09:42 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> > Am 10.03.22 um 09:41 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
> >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:38 AM Reindl Harald
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Am 10.03.22 um 09:36 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
> > we have 2022
Am 10.03.22 um 09:42 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 10.03.22 um 09:41 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:38 AM Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 10.03.22 um 09:36 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
we have 2022 and volume normalization is done via anlazye and
meta-tags
where tools exists FOR R128
Am 10.03.22 um 09:41 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:38 AM Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 10.03.22 um 09:36 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
we have 2022 and volume normalization is done via anlazye and meta-tags
where tools exists FOR R128 normalization
FFmpeg can do r128 scanning just
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:38 AM Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 10.03.22 um 09:36 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
> >> we have 2022 and volume normalization is done via anlazye and meta-tags
> >> where tools exists FOR R128 normalization
> >>
> >
> > FFmpeg can do r128 scanning just fine
>
> if you only
Am 10.03.22 um 09:36 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
we have 2022 and volume normalization is done via anlazye and meta-tags
where tools exists FOR R128 normalization
FFmpeg can do r128 scanning just fine
if you only know how to use a hammer you probably will use the hammer to
open your beer - it
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:26 AM Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 10.03.22 um 08:54 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
>
> >> Perhaps you need a different tool. If you're actually just dealing with
> >> music files you should snag foobar2000 and use it for this job
> instead. It
> >> uses the same R128
Am 10.03.22 um 08:54 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
Perhaps you need a different tool. If you're actually just dealing with
music files you should snag foobar2000 and use it for this job instead. It
uses the same R128 algorithm. It is made for dealing with music, being a
music player. And you can
16 matches
Mail list logo
