Just a quick heads-up, you seem to have forgotten to put any text in your
message, Mr. Shupert. It just quotes mark's email.
You're welcome,
David
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 17:26:20 -0400
jim shupert wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 8:02 AM Mark Filipak
> wrote:
>
> > Is there more to this? If there
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 09:31:37 +0100
Nicolas George wrote:
> David Niklas (12024-02-04):
> > Mark was good enough to privately email me
>
> Sorry for you.
;)
> > And here I was looking forwards to the day when I could support FLOSS
> > devs after getting a job... s
Mark Filipak wrote:
> On 04/02/2024 11.34, David Niklas wrote:
> > Mark, currently, the system that's set up works so that those who have
> > give money to the devs who then do work that benefits everyone. So the
> > rich help the poor.
>
> Sounds good, but it's a fal
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 14:49:50 -0500
Mark Filipak wrote:
> On 01/02/2024 14.41, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
> > On 2/1/2024 11:26 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
> >>
> >> There needs to be an FFmpeg Guild and there needs to be an FFmpeg
> >> industry. You guys/gals need to >> make a living. How can we make
> >>
Hello,
On the internet archive, (the site is legal from what I've read), you can
watch videos. They often allow you to see them in several formats.
So the question came to me, which is the most lossless?
I could find this out from the quantization, or possibly comparing the
two if such metadata
On Sat, 4 Feb 2023 21:12:11 +
Carl Zwanzig wrote:
> There's nothing "snowflake" about the FAQ's Rules and Etiquette and
> they're pretty normal and standard for technical mailing lists, I
> assume you're on a few besides this one.
I just want to point out that although most technical forums
I just have to say that this whole discussion has me laughing out loud at
my keyboard. The conversation is so funny and clueless.
Thanks for making my day,
David
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
On Sat, 31 Dec 2022 09:23:30 +0530
Gyan Doshi wrote:
> On 2022-12-31 08:15 am, David Niklas wrote:
> > Sorry for taking so long to reply.
> > It is not working. Terminal output below.
> >
> > % ffmpeg -i Ducksinarow.mp4 -filter_complex
> > "[0:0]drawbo
On Sat, 24 Dec 2022 10:48:14 +0100
Bouke / Videotoolshed wrote:
> On 23 Dec 2022, at 22:55, David Niklas wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > What I'd like to achieve is sort of like censoring, but with a black
> > box.
> >
> > I can find plenty of exampl
Hello,
What I'd like to achieve is sort of like censoring, but with a black box.
I can find plenty of examples of how to add a black box to a video, but
the problem is it is always either the whole video, or only at the
beginning/end, that the examples add black boxes to. I cannot seem to
figure
On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 11:49:04 -0800
Dan Harkless wrote:
> MakeMKV is in a semi-permanent Beta state, so you need to periodically
> download new license keys from:
>
> https://forum.makemkv.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1053
>
> but aside from that, it's easy to use, and is free and open-source.
On some US TV channels the commercial breaks are timed. As in, they start
at A, B, and C time and end at X, Y, and Z time.
Perhaps that will work for your needs.
Alternatively, you could combine several approaches and write a basic
identification guessing engine and then pass the cut clip to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello,
I wanted to test the integrity of some videos. I just wanted to verify
that the container and frame data is ok, if the color is off on a pixel or
two or there is a erroneous sound output for one sample, it doesn't
matter.
I could try and
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:48:48 +0200
Tobias Rapp wrote:
> On 29.04.2021 16:47, David Niklas wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > But when I try to come up with a useful value from that data I get a
> > very large value. Much higher than the typical 24-60 or so for
> > quantiza
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 09:21:52 +0200
Tobias Rapp wrote:
> On 27.04.2021 20:38, David Niklas wrote:
> > Hello,
> > If I ffprobe an mp4 file I can see things like its bitrate and its
> > resolution. But, I can't find what the quantization of the video is.
> >
> > How
Hello,
If I ffprobe an mp4 file I can see things like its bitrate and its
resolution. But, I can't find what the quantization of the video is.
How can I determine that?
Thanks,
David
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
Hi guys,
I was having a problem with a ghost audio stream making it into the video
I was editing. I'm interesting is learning how it got their, and more
importantly, how to avoid this in the future.
% ffmpeg -version
Trailing options were found on the commandline.
ffmpeg version 3.2.15-0+deb9u1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 22:37:00 +0100
Moritz Barsnick wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 13:43:44 -0500, Ted Park wrote:
> > > Yes, Ray Tracing eXtensions (RTX) may be relevant to video editing,
> > > and therefore, ffmpeg, at a later date.
> > How?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
As a follow up:
It was brought to my attention that some people think that RTX is
marketing jargon and/or that my poll is an attempt at forcing a
technology upon companies.
Ray Tracing eXtensions is not jargon. It is a large portion of Nvidia's
19 matches
Mail list logo